Baggage Handling Inspection Using Sensor-Mounted Items

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current baggage handling systems require frequent manual inspections, which are time-consuming, prone to errors, and can lead to unnecessary disruptions and costs, as they are typically performed at predefined intervals rather than in real-time, and involve inconvenient security checks for inspectors.

Innovation Solution

A non-invasive inspection system using sensors mounted on items moving along the mechanical system, such as baggage, to capture operational data including vibrations, sounds, and other parameters, which are compared to historical data to detect deviations and errors, allowing for real-time monitoring and notification of maintenance needs without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection is performed at predefined intervals, then the system can be monitored periodically, but the inspection cannot detect faults in real-time and may lead to system failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidtime delay in fault detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated sensor-based monitoring system. Sensors mounted on baggage items continuously collect operational data (vibrations, sounds, temperatures) from the baggage handling system, eliminating the need for periodic manual inspections and enabling real-time fault detection through automated data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system operates continuously rather than at discrete intervals. Sensors mounted on moving baggage items continuously monitor system conditions throughout operation, ensuring uninterrupted data collection and immediate fault detection, thereby eliminating time delays associated with periodic manual inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Reliability

If manual inspection is performed frequently, then fault detection capability improves, but operational disruptions and inspection costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem operational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The baggage handling system performs self-inspection through sensors mounted on baggage items that automatically collect and transmit operational data. The system monitors its own conditions without requiring external manual intervention, eliminating the need to take the system out of service for inspection and maintaining continuous operational productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous operation by performing inspection functions during normal operation. Sensors continuously monitor system conditions without interrupting baggage handling, allowing the system to maintain full productivity while simultaneously detecting faults in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If manual inspection is performed, then human judgment can identify faults, but human error and subjectivity affect inspection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human sensory inspection with automated sensors and data analysis systems. Objective measurements of vibrations, sounds, temperatures, and other parameters are collected and analyzed algorithmically, eliminating human error, subjectivity, and variability while improving both detection accuracy and consistency across all inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data is constantly monitored, analyzed, and compared against baseline conditions. Automated alerts are generated when deviations indicate potential faults, providing consistent and reliable fault detection without human intervention and eliminating variability in inspection judgments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If inspectors are deployed for frequent manual inspection, then monitoring coverage improves, but security checks and inspector availability become constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverageVSAvoidinspector availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates the need for human inspectors by enabling the baggage handling system to monitor itself through mounted sensors. Baggage items essentially inspect the system as they move through it, providing continuous monitoring coverage without requiring inspector availability or undergoing security checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor-mounted inspection system provides universal monitoring capability across the entire baggage handling system. A single sensor deployment on baggage items enables comprehensive monitoring of multiple system components (conveyors, sorters, loaders) simultaneously, replacing the need for multiple specialized inspectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides accurate, real-time, and proactive maintenance, reducing the likelihood of system failures, minimizing costs and disruptions, and eliminating human error by enabling timely maintenance actions based on actual system conditions.

Implementation Method 1

capture operational data including vibrations, sounds, and other parameters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

capture operational data including vibrations, sounds, and other parameters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS11479416B2Inspection system
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11479416B2 patent drawing
  • US11479416B2 patent drawing
  • US11479416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of non-invasive inspection of a mechanical system are described. In an example implementation, a first operational data from a detector mounted on an item being handled by a mechanical system is retrieved. The detector may include one or more sensors, and the first operational data is indicative of a current operational condition of the mechanical system. The first operational data can be compared with a corresponding historical first operational data and an error in the current operational condition of the mechanical system is determined based on the comparison. In response to the identification of the error, a notification is generated to perform a non-invasive inspection of the mechanical system.