Balance-Assistive Linkage With Lockable Joints for Fall Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The degeneration of the human balance control system, often due to aging or pathologies, increases the risk of falls, which are a significant concern during rehabilitation therapy and daily living, with existing technologies failing to provide effective fall prevention.

Innovation Solution

A balance-assistive device with a support interface, sensors, and a linkage structure featuring independently actuatable lockable lower-pair joints that can rapidly transition between compliant and rigid states to provide support when abnormal forces are detected, using a controller to lock the joints and immobilize the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a rigid support structure is used to prevent falls, then fall prevention capability is improved, but user freedom of movement and comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall prevention capabilityVSAvoiduser freedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure employs dynamically adjustable stiffness through lockable lower-pair joints that can transition between locked (rigid) and unlocked (compliant) states. During normal activity, the joints remain unlocked allowing natural movement. When abnormal forces indicating a fall are detected by sensors, the controller locks the joints to provide rigid support, thus adapting the structure's stiffness to operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the mechanical parameter of joint stiffness by actuating braking mechanisms at selected lower-pair joints. The controller receives sensor data about forces exerted on the support interface and actuates the braking mechanisms to lock joints, transforming the support structure from a compliant state during normal use to a rigid state during fall prevention, thereby optimizing the balance between comfort and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a flexible support structure is used to allow movement, then user comfort and freedom of movement are improved, but fall prevention capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser freedom of movementVSAvoidfall prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure dynamically adjusts its mechanical properties through lockable lower-pair joints. During normal activity, the joints remain unlocked providing flexible support for comfortable movement. When sensors detect abnormal forces indicating a fall, the controller rapidly locks the joints to provide rigid support, thus adapting the structure's stiffness to operational requirements and ensuring fall prevention capability is available when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the mechanical parameter of joint stiffness by actuating braking mechanisms at selected lower-pair joints. The controller receives sensor data about forces exerted on the support interface and actuates the braking mechanisms to lock joints, transforming the support structure from a compliant state during normal use to a rigid state during fall prevention, thereby optimizing the balance between comfort and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a complex locking mechanism is used to provide rigid support, then fall prevention capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall prevention capabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into multiple independent lower-pair joints, each equipped with its own braking mechanism. This segmentation allows the system to lock only the necessary joints to prevent falls while maintaining simplicity in each individual joint's design. The controller can selectively lock specific joints based on the detected fall direction and severity, reducing the overall complexity compared to a fully rigid locking system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different lower-pair joints are equipped with different properties (lockable vs. non-lockable) based on their specific functional requirements. The braking mechanisms are integrated locally at each lockable joint, allowing independent actuation and simplifying the control system. This local quality approach enables the system to provide rigid support where needed while maintaining simplicity in the overall mechanism design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260014044A1Balance-assistive device and system
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL PTE LTD
  • US20260014044A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014044A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014044A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device having a support interface and one or more sensors disposed to sense forces exerted on the support interface. The device includes a linkage structure having a plurality of lower-pair joints and a plurality of linkages. The support interface is coupled to one of the plurality of linkages. Each of the plurality of lower-pair joints couples two of the plurality of linkages such that the linkage structure defines a closed kinematic chain. A selected plurality of the lower-pair joints is a plurality of lockable lower-pair joints. Each of the plurality of lockable lower-pair joints has a locally actuatable braking mechanism that is actuatable independently of any other of the plurality of lower-pair joints.