Dynamically Balanced Coriolis Gyroscope with Co-located Proof Masses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Coriolis vibratory gyroscopes face limitations in achieving high Q-factors due to anchor losses, particularly in the y-mode, as the net force along the y-axis is not balanced, leading to susceptibility to anchor losses and lower Q-factors.

Innovation Solution

A dynamically balanced Coriolis vibratory gyroscope design featuring two proof masses with co-located centers of mass, where the inner proof mass is nested within the outer proof mass, and both are vibrated in anti-phase or in-phase motion to achieve force and torque balance on both x and y axes, minimizing anchor losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single proof mass is used in a conventional Coriolis vibratory gyroscope, then the device structure is simple, but anchor losses occur due to unbalanced net force on the y-axis, resulting in low Q-factor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidQ-factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single proof mass is segmented into two separate proof masses (first and second proof masses) with equal mass. These masses are positioned symmetrically on opposite sides of the x-axis, allowing their vibratory forces to be balanced while maintaining structural simplicity. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling force balance without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second proof mass acts as a counterweight to the first proof mass. When both masses vibrate in anti-phase, their forces cancel each other out, creating a balanced system with zero net force on the substrate. This anti-weight principle eliminates anchor losses and achieves high Q-factor while maintaining a relatively simple structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Manufacturing precision

If proof masses are positioned asymmetrically to simplify manufacturing, then manufacturing precision requirements are reduced, but the net force balance is compromised, leading to increased anchor losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning toleranceVSAvoidanchor loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The design intentionally introduces asymmetry in the y-positioning of the two proof masses (equal but opposite y-coordinates) while maintaining symmetry in mass and x-positioning. This controlled asymmetry enables force balance in the y-direction while keeping manufacturing requirements practical. The symmetric placement relative to the origin simplifies manufacturing compared to asymmetric designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Loss of energy

If the resonator is decoupled from the substrate using a dynamically balanced structure, then anchor losses are minimized and Q-factor is maximized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchor lossVSAvoidmechanical element complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force balance and torque balance functions are merged into a single symmetric configuration of two proof masses. By positioning equal masses at opposite y-coordinates and driving them in anti-phase, both force balance (eliminating anchor losses) and torque balance (maintaining rotational symmetry) are achieved simultaneously. This merging reduces complexity compared to separate balancing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves high Q-factors on both x and y modes by eliminating net force and torque transmitted to the substrate, resulting in improved performance and accuracy in measuring angular velocity and acceleration.

Implementation Method 1

vibrating the inner and outer proof masses in anti-phase or in-phase motion to achieve force and torque balance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial force: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

A dynamically balanced Coriolis vibratory gyroscope design featuring two proof masses with co-located centers of mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDynamic balance: Balance

Implementation Method 3

Coriolis vibratory gyroscopes (CVGs)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoriolis force: Coriolis Force

Data Source

PatentUS10247554B2Fully balanced micro-machined inertial sensor
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US10247554B2 patent drawing
  • US10247554B2 patent drawing
  • US10247554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The improvement includes an outer proof mass having a corresponding center of mass; and an inner proof mass having a corresponding center of mass, where the corresponding centers of mass of the outer proof mass and the inner proof mass are approximately co-located. Thus, a double Foucault pendulum is essentially provided in a micromachined gyroscope.