Balanced Trim Regulator Cage for Pressure Droop Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Balanced pressure regulators, particularly diaphragm-type, suffer from droop or a decrease in setpoint with increased flow due to unbalanced fluid forces and geometrical limitations that lead to fluid short-circuiting and cavitation issues.

Innovation Solution

A balanced trim pressure regulator design featuring a cage with balancing passages that connect the fluid passageway to a balancing chamber, which balances fluid forces on the valve plug, and includes features like chamfered surfaces and circumferentially distributed openings to direct fluid flow effectively, reducing droop and enhancing pressure regulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If balancing passages are incorporated into the valve plug, then fluid forces are balanced and droop is reduced, but the valve plug geometry becomes complex and manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulation consistencyVSAvoidvalve plug manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The balancing function is segmented from the valve plug and relocated to the cage structure. The cage now contains the balancing passages and defines the balancing chamber, while the valve plug focuses solely on sealing and flow control functions. This segmentation simplifies the valve plug geometry and manufacturing while maintaining the pressure balancing effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cage acts as an intermediary structure that mediates between the high-pressure inlet fluid and the valve plug. It incorporates balancing passages that divert process fluid to a balancing chamber, creating a intermediate pressure zone that counteracts forces on the valve plug without requiring complex internal passages in the plug itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If larger valve orifices are used to increase flow capacity, then productivity improves, but fluid pressure crushes the valve seat causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow capacityVSAvoidvalve seat integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

A balancing chamber is introduced that applies counter-pressure to the valve seat area. Process fluid is diverted through balancing passages to this chamber, creating an opposing pressure force that counteracts the crushing effect of high inlet pressure on the valve seat, allowing larger orifices to be used without damaging the seat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure distribution is made non-uniform by creating a localized balancing chamber that applies counter-pressure specifically to the valve seat region. This allows the valve seat area to withstand high inlet pressures while the overall valve maintains high flow capacity through large orifices elsewhere in the flow path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If process fluid is diverted to balance forces on the valve plug, then droop is eliminated, but fluid short-circuiting and cavitation occur due to geometrical limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetpoint stabilityVSAvoidcavitation and fluid short-circuiting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The balancing passages are arranged in a circumferential pattern around the valve plug, utilizing the radial dimension. Multiple openings distributed circumferentially create balanced forces in all radial directions while maintaining proper fluid flow paths that prevent short-circuiting and cavitation by ensuring smooth, distributed flow diversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively counteracts droop by balancing fluid forces and optimizing fluid flow, resulting in more consistent outlet pressures and preventing cavitation, even in regulators with small port sizes where traditional balancing passages are not feasible.

Implementation Method 1

a portion of the upstream pressure is diverted to act on an unexposed portion of the valve plug or an unexposed portion of the valve plug moving mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the valve plug is 'balanced,' by not having a net effect of fluid pressure act on the valve plug (or valve plug moving mechanism). In this way, the decaying inlet characteristic is eliminated (or greatly reduced) because the fluid forces acting on valve plug (or on the valve plug moving mechanism) cancel out, resulting in a net zero force attributed to the fluid pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce balance: Balance

Data Source

PatentUS11249497B2Balanced trim regulator
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 FISHER CONTROLS INT LLC
  • US11249497B2 patent drawing
  • US11249497B2 patent drawing
  • US11249497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A balanced trim pressure regulator includes a valve body having a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet connected by a fluid passageway. An orifice is disposed between the fluid inlet and the fluid outlet. A valve seat is disposed within the fluid passageway. A movable valve plug is disposed within the fluid passageway, the movable valve plug interacting with the valve seat to selectively open or close the fluid passageway. A cage is disposed in the fluid passageway, the cage surrounding the valve plug, and the cage including at least one a balancing passage that fluidly connects the fluid passageway with a balancing chamber.