Balanced Valve Trim for Regulator Velocity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Regulator valves often become oversized for changed operating conditions, leading to potential damage from extreme velocities at the valve seat when operating near fully open or closed states, especially under higher pressure conditions, and existing solutions like smaller valve seats compromise performance.

Innovation Solution

A modified balanced valve trim with a reduced orifice size and internal pressure balancing mechanism, allowing the valve disk assembly to operate further away from the seat ring, reducing extreme velocities and maintaining control across a range of inlet pressures without altering the actuator or valve body.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the regulator valve is sized for higher flow rates, then it can handle peak demand, but the valve operates near fully open state causing extreme velocities and potential damage to sealing surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate capacityVSAvoidextreme velocities at valve seat
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve trim is segmented into multiple components: a valve disk assembly with balanced bore, a cage with restricted orifice, and a seat ring. This segmentation creates separate functional zones that control fluid flow in stages, reducing velocity at the seat while maintaining overall flow capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cage with restricted orifice acts as an intermediary element between the valve disk and seat ring. It controls and regulates the fluid flow, reducing the velocity of fluid reaching the seat area and preventing direct high-velocity impact on sealing surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stress or pressure

If the regulator valve is sized for higher pressure conditions, then it can maintain pressure regulation, but the valve operates near fully closed state causing extreme velocities and potential damage to sealing surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulation capabilityVSAvoidextreme velocities at valve seat
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The balanced bore in the valve disk assembly creates counterbalancing pressure forces. Fluid pressure acts on both sides of the valve disk, creating a balanced force system that reduces the net force on the sealing surfaces and prevents extreme velocity conditions during pressure regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The valve trim design dynamically balances pressures across the valve disk assembly. The restricted orifice in the cage and balanced bore work together to create dynamic pressure equalization, preventing static high-pressure conditions that would cause extreme velocities at the seat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a smaller valve seat is used to reduce velocity, then damage to sealing surfaces is reduced, but valve performance and flow capacity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage to sealing surfacesVSAvoidvalve flow capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves the velocity reduction mechanism from the seat area to the cage orifice and balanced bore. Instead of reducing seat size, the design creates a three-dimensional flow control system that reduces velocity through restricted orifices and balanced pressure zones while maintaining full seat diameter for optimal sealing and flow capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the valve operates near fully open or closed states, then it can handle varying flow demands, but extreme velocities occur causing damage to sealing surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow demand adjustmentVSAvoidextreme velocities at valve seat
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The restricted orifice in the cage and balanced bore create preliminary flow control before fluid reaches the seat. This preliminary action reduces fluid velocity and balances pressure before the valve disk approaches the seat, preventing extreme velocity conditions even when the valve operates near fully open or closed states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the regulator valve to maintain effective operation under lower volume flow conditions without damaging the sealing surfaces, reducing wear and maintaining performance across varying flow rates without the need for resizing the valve or actuator.

Implementation Method 1

a first effective pressure area is formed at the first end of the interior space, and a second effective pressure area is defined at the second end of the interior space. The second effective pressure area opposes the first effective pressure area.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization: Pascal's Law

Data Source

PatentEP3250975B1Mechanism and method to adjust size of balanced valve
Publication Date: 2020.11.04 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT REGULATOR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP3250975B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3250975B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3250975B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A balanced valve trim, a regulator valve with a balanced valve trim, and methods for modifying a regulator valve with a balanced valve trim assembly to accommodate different volume flow rates through the regulator valve are disclosed.