Bale Forming Control System Dynamic PTO Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bale formation methods in agricultural balers require manual setting of PTO speed and bale density pressure, leading to increased fuel consumption, bale damage, and crop loss due to variable operating conditions during bale formation.

Innovation Solution

A control system that automatically determines and adjusts bale density pressure and PTO speed based on sensed operating conditions such as bale size, weight, moisture content, and fuel consumption, while maintaining a fixed bale chamber speed relative to PTO speed, to minimize bale rotations and maintain desired bale density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the bale is rotated multiple times in the bale chamber to achieve desired density, then the bale density is improved, but the fuel consumption and power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebale densityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the bale chamber speed and PTO speed during bale formation based on real-time sensor feedback. The controller modifies operating parameters mid-process to achieve target density with minimal rotations, resolving the contradiction between achieving precise density control and minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors continuously monitor bale formation parameters and feed this information back to the controller, which automatically adjusts bale chamber speed and PTO speed. This closed-loop feedback system enables precise density control while minimizing the number of rotations required, thereby reducing fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the bale is rotated multiple times to increase density, then the bale density is improved, but the bale may be damaged by components and crop material may fall out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebale densityVSAvoidbale integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts bale chamber speed based on real-time conditions, reducing the total number of rotations required to achieve desired density. Fewer rotations directly reduce the risk of bale damage from mechanical components and prevent crop material from falling out, while still achieving target density through optimized pressure application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time sensor feedback enables the controller to monitor bale formation and adjust parameters to achieve target density with minimal rotations. This prevents excessive mechanical stress on the bale and reduces the likelihood of damage from rolls, belts, and other components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual setting of PTO speed and bale density pressure is used, then the system operation is simple, but the fuel consumption increases and bale formation is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors and adjusts its own operating parameters based on sensor feedback. The controller self-regulates bale chamber speed and PTO speed without requiring manual intervention, achieving optimal fuel efficiency while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated feedback control system continuously monitors bale formation parameters and adjusts PTO speed and bale chamber speed accordingly. This eliminates the need for manual setting while optimizing fuel consumption, as the system adapts to changing conditions in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If fixed bale chamber speed is maintained, then the system operation is simplified, but the ability to adapt to changing conditions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from fixed to dynamic speed control, where bale chamber speed and PTO speed are continuously adjusted based on real-time sensor feedback. This enables adaptation to changing bale formation conditions while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback from sensors enables the system to automatically adapt to changing conditions by adjusting bale chamber speed and PTO speed as needed. The controller processes sensor data and modifies operating parameters dynamically, maintaining both simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11751511B2Bale forming control system and method
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US11751511B2 patent drawing
  • US11751511B2 patent drawing
  • US11751511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling formation of a bale includes: forming a bale from crop material by rotating the bale in a bale chamber; receiving with a controller of a control system at least one operating condition value corresponding to at least one operating condition sensed by a sensor when the bale is forming; automatically determining with the controller a power take-off speed of a drive mechanism responsive to receiving the at least one received operating condition value; and applying with the control system the determined power take-off speed to the drive mechanism.