Bale Opener Laser Scanning for Dynamic Safety Zone Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety systems for textile machines, such as bale openers, face challenges with cumbersome light beam barriers, sensor malfunctions due to vibrations, and limited lateral coverage, leading to unreliable protection of personnel from moving parts.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a two-dimensional laser scanner with adjustable and time-variable monitoring areas, allowing for redundant coverage of different protective fields, which can be switched dynamically to ensure safety and robustness, even when the removal element is rotated.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a light beam barrier is used to protect dangerous areas, then personnel safety is improved, but the device complexity and operational cumbersome nature increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonnel safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective device is divided into multiple independent sensor units arranged in a matrix pattern, where each sensor monitors a specific sector. This segmentation allows the complex monitoring task to be distributed across multiple simple units, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor matrix serves multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors for personnel intrusion, detects fiber bales, identifies foreign objects, and provides collision monitoring. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate detection systems, reducing device complexity while maintaining high reliability through redundant monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If sensors are attached to moving parts to create mobile protection areas, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to vibrations causing malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobile protection areasVSAvoidsensor malfunction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor matrix is extracted from the moving removal element and repositioned on the stationary support structure. This extraction removes the sensors from the source of vibrations, eliminating the reliability problem while the sensors continue to monitor the moving removal element and create mobile protection areas through electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The stationary sensor matrix acts as an intermediary between the control system and the moving removal element. Instead of attaching sensors to the moving part, the stationary sensors optically monitor the moving element's position and status, providing adaptability without vibration-induced reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If ultrasonic sensors are used for protection, then detection capability is improved, but cost and susceptibility to air influences increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidcost and susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive optical sensors instead of expensive ultrasonic sensors. These simple optical sensors are sufficient for the detection task and are not susceptible to air influences like wind or air layers, reducing both cost and environmental susceptibility while maintaining adequate detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If the monitoring area is reduced to avoid detecting fiber bales, then false alarms are reduced, but lateral coverage and protection effectiveness decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidlateral coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor matrix dynamically adjusts its monitoring behavior based on the detected object. When a fiber bale is detected, the system recognizes the characteristic pattern and temporarily excludes that area from alarm generation. When a person is detected, full monitoring is maintained. This dynamic adaptation allows comprehensive lateral coverage without false alarms from fiber bales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously analyzes sensor signals to identify whether detected objects are fiber bales or persons based on their distinct reflection patterns. This feedback mechanism allows the monitoring area to be effectively expanded to cover lateral areas while maintaining reliability by using intelligent discrimination to prevent false alarms from fiber bales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a more reliable, fault-resistant, and cost-effective safety system that effectively monitors the area around the bale opener, reducing the risk of accidents by detecting intrusions and ensuring the machine stops in case of anomalies, while allowing for reduced lateral distance and improved lateral coverage.

Implementation Method 1

the protective device is at least a two-dimensional laser scanner with which at least one adjustable and time-variable monitoring area is monitored

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

a two-dimensional laser scanner 12 is present on the face of the removal element. The laser scanner 12 scans their surroundings by emitting a laser pulse. If the laser pulse hits an object, it is reflected to the receiver of the laser scanner 12

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP3239367B1Method for operating a bale opener and such a bale opener
Publication Date: 2021.09.08 MASCHINENFABRIK RIETER AG
  • EP3239367B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3239367B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3c

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a bale opener (1) with a take-off element (3) and a protective device for protecting people if they enter a danger zone of the take-off element (3), which protective device consists of sensory protective means, with a monitoring area (13 , 131, 132, 133) is detected at the end under the removal element (3), and wherein the removal element (3) is fastened to a removal tower (2). According to the invention, the protective device is at least a two-dimensional laser scanner (12) on which at least one adjustable and time-variable monitoring area (13, 131, 132, 133) is monitored. The invention also relates to a corresponding bale opener (1).