Bale Processor Dual Rotor Chopping Length Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bale processors have limited ability to output chopped material at different selected lengths, restricting their versatility in applications such as mulching and livestock feeding.

Innovation Solution

A bale processor design featuring a primary rotor and a secondary rotor, where the secondary rotor is offset and can be selectively engaged or disengaged, allowing for three distinct chopping phases: initial chopping by the primary rotor, secondary chopping by the offset rotor, and additional chopping by the primary rotor again, with a movable internal deflector controlling the passage between the rotors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single rotor configuration is used, then the device complexity is low, but the ability to control chopped material length is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to output chopped material at different selected lengthsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single rotor is segmented into two separate rotors (primary rotor with first set of flails and secondary rotor with second set of flails). This segmentation allows independent control of each rotor's engagement and rotation speed, enabling multiple chopping configurations and adjustable material length output while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control by making the secondary rotor selectively engageable and disengageable from the drive source, and by allowing independent rotation speed control of each rotor. This dynamic capability enables the system to adapt between different chopping intensities and material length requirements without increasing permanent device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple rotors are added to increase chopping capability, then the chopping precision and material length control improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechopping precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chopping function is segmented across two rotors with distinct flail configurations. The primary rotor performs initial chopping while the secondary rotor provides additional chopping passes. This segmentation enables precise control over material length by adjusting which rotor engages and at what speed, achieving high chopping precision without requiring an overly complex multi-stage system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Both rotors serve multiple functions: the primary rotor can operate alone for lighter chopping needs, the secondary rotor can engage for finer chopping, and both can operate together for maximum precision. This multi-functionality allows a single dual-rotor design to replace what would otherwise require multiple separate chopping mechanisms, maintaining simplicity while achieving high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the secondary rotor is positioned to chop material after the primary rotor, then the chopping effectiveness increases, but the risk of flail interference between rotors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechopping effectivenessVSAvoidflail interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The rotors are positioned asymmetrically with the secondary rotor offset from the primary rotor's plane. This asymmetric arrangement allows the secondary rotor to chop material that has already been processed by the primary rotor without the flails of the two rotors interfering with each other, maintaining high chopping effectiveness while eliminating the harmful interference effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The offset positioning creates an intermediate spatial relationship between the two rotors. Material serves as the intermediary that passes from the primary rotor's chopping zone to the secondary rotor's chopping zone, allowing both rotors to function effectively without direct flail-to-flail contact or interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9769987B2Bale processor
Publication Date: 2017.09.26 VERMEER MFG CO
  • US9769987B2 patent drawing
  • US9769987B2 patent drawing
  • US9769987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a bale processor includes a hopper for receiving a bale of baled material, a discharge opening for outputting chopped material, and a processing section below the hopper and intersecting the hopper at an impingement zone. The processing section has primary and secondary rotors. The primary rotor is rotatable and has flails sufficiently long to extend into the impingement zone to chop the material from the bale received in the hopper when the primary rotor is rotated. The secondary rotor is rotatable and has flails to chop the material after being chopped by the primary rotor. The secondary rotor is offset from the primary rotor such that the secondary rotor is on one side of the primary rotor, the discharge opening is on another side of the primary rotor, and the only passage from the secondary rotor to the discharge opening crosses the primary rotor.