Baler Controller Tractor Motion Override Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural tractors face issues with premature bale ejection and motion re-initiation before the bale is fully wrapped or the gate is closed, leading to incomplete cycles and lost time, as existing automated systems cannot always account for all operational exceptions.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling a tractor-implement combination, where the baler controller generates a halt signal to prevent tractor motion until specific conditions are met, allowing the operator to override automation using a command device, enabling motion only when the bale is properly prepared, and providing a simple way to exit automation for manual control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the automated system prevents tractor motion until bale ejection is complete, then operational reliability is improved, but operator flexibility and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidoperator flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the operational context. When the automated system is active, it enforces strict motion prevention during critical phases (bale wrapping, gate closing). However, when the operator activates the override function through the command device, the system transitions to a more flexible state that allows motion while still monitoring critical parameters. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by providing both strict control and operator flexibility as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The command device serves as an intermediary mechanism between the operator and the automated control system. It provides a formalized override pathway that allows operators to request motion during critical operations without completely bypassing the safety system. The system mediates between the automated protection logic and operator intent, requiring explicit operator action to override while maintaining the automated system as the default control mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If the automated system monitors all operational exceptions, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational sequence precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor critical operational parameters (bale wrapping status, gate position, ejection completion) and automatically adjust tractor motion authorization based on the state of these parameters. The system provides continuous feedback to both the operator (through system status indicators) and the motion control system, ensuring that motion is only authorized when operational conditions are appropriate. This feedback-based approach achieves high operational precision without requiring complex manual monitoring and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system performs preliminary checks and preparations before authorizing tractor motion. It monitors and verifies that critical operations (bale wrapping, gate closing) are complete or in appropriate states before allowing motion to commence. This preliminary verification approach ensures operational sequence precision by preventing motion during critical phases, while the complexity is managed by automating the monitoring logic rather than requiring multiple separate control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of substance

If the system prevents motion before gate is fully closed, then loss of substance is reduced, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial lossVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical interlocks and physical prevention mechanisms with electronic control and sensor-based monitoring. Instead of using mechanical devices to physically prevent gate opening or bale ejection, the system uses electronic signals from sensors (gate position sensors, bale presence sensors) to control hydraulic actuators and motion authorization. This substitution allows for more precise and faster detection of operational status, reducing both material loss and cycle time by enabling quicker, more accurate decision-making about when motion is safe to authorize.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9089095B2Tractor-implement control system method
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 DEERE & CO
  • US9089095B2 patent drawing
  • US9089095B2 patent drawing
  • US9089095B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tractor includes an electronic tractor controller. A baler includes an electronic baler controller. The baler controller submits a halt signal to the tractor controller when a bale size is equal to or exceeds a first predetermined size. The baler controller generates a tractor halt signal in response to certain conditions of the baler system and the tractor controller preventing tractor motion in response to the halt signal. When the baler controller is generating the halt signal, tractor motion is enabled if the operator commands the tractor to move by manipulating the command device, and within a certain time period of said command being issued, the baler controller generates a tractor motion enabling signal in response a status of the baler system. When the baler controller is generating the halt signal, tractor motion is enabled if the operator moves the tractor command device in a special manner.