Baler Door Safety Latch for Fail-Safe Closure Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing balers pose a safety risk as the upper door can accidentally close, potentially catching a user's hand, especially when the door movement mechanism fails.

Innovation Solution

A safety system is integrated into the baler, featuring a safety arm connected to the door movement means, latching means that can move between allowing and preventing door movement, and equilibrium means that shifts the latching means to prevent door closure when the door movement means is interrupted.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a lock is provided to prevent accidental door closure, then safety is improved, but the device becomes more complex and the lock is cumbersome to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the safety function from a traditional lock mechanism and implements it through a separate safety arm with latching means that engages with receiving means on the door. This separates the safety function from the door movement mechanism, providing safety without requiring a cumbersome lock that needs to be manually operated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety system operates automatically through the interaction between the safety arm, latching means, and equilibrium means. When the door movement means is interrupted, the equilibrium means automatically moves the latching means to engage with the receiving means, preventing accidental closure without requiring user intervention or a manual lock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a lock is provided to prevent accidental door closure, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to cumbersome lock operation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system operates automatically through the interaction between the safety arm, latching means, and equilibrium means. When the door movement means is interrupted, the equilibrium means automatically moves the latching means to engage with the receiving means, preventing accidental closure without requiring user intervention or a manual lock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The safety arm is pre-configured with latching means that can engage with receiving means on the door. The equilibrium means is pre-positioned to automatically activate the latching mechanism when the door movement means fails, preventing closure before an accident can occur without requiring manual lock operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the door can be opened most of the time for waste deposition, then ease of operation is improved, but safety deteriorates due to risk of hand catching when door closes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system uses simple, robust mechanical components (safety arm, latching means, equilibrium means) that provide reliable safety protection. These components are designed to be fail-safe and automatically activate when needed, providing continuous safety protection without interfering with normal door operation during waste deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety function is extracted from the door movement mechanism itself and implemented through a separate safety arm system. This allows the door to remain freely operable for waste deposition while an independent safety mechanism provides protection against accidental closure, separating the operational freedom from safety concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If a safety system with latching means is implemented, then safety is improved by preventing door closure when movement means is interrupted, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety arm is connected to both the door movement means and the latching means, merging these functions into a single integrated component. The equilibrium means serves dual purposes by both positioning the latching means and providing the force for automatic engagement, reducing the need for additional separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety arm acts as an intermediary component that connects the door movement means to the latching means. This intermediate element translates the state of the door movement means into the appropriate latching action, providing a simple mechanical linkage that avoids the need for complex control systems or multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The safety system effectively prevents the door from closing when the door movement mechanism fails, thereby reducing the risk of accidents and eliminating the need for cumbersome locks.

Implementation Method 1

equilibrium means connected to the safety arm and configured for moving the latching means from the first position to the second position when the door movement means is interrupted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP4534278A1Baler comprising a safety system
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 BRAMIDAN
  • EP4534278A1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP4534278A1 patent drawingFigure 1b~1c
  • EP4534278A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b

AI summary

Disclosed is a baler (100, 200) for making bales of a waste material. The baler comprises a compaction compartment (102, 202), a door (104, 204), door movement means (106, 206), and a frame part (108, 208). The frame part comprises at least one receiving means (110, 210). The baler comprises a safety system (112, 212). The safety system comprises a safety arm (114, 214) configured to be connected to the door movement means, latching means (116, 216) connected to the safety arm and configured for moving between a first position (118, 218) allowing the door to move and a second position (120, 220) preventing the door from moving by engaging into the at least one receiving means, and equilibrium means (122, 222) connected to the safety arm and configured for moving the latching means from the first position to the second position when the door movement means is interrupted.