Agricultural Baler Wrap Control for Segmented and Continuous Film

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural balers lack a systematic approach to efficiently handle both segmented and continuous bale wraps, leading to inefficiencies in the bale wrapping process.

Innovation Solution

A control system for agricultural balers that includes a controller to determine the type of bale wrap (segmented or continuous) and adjust the braking system to separate segments or cut the wrap as needed, using sensors and user input to manage the wrapping process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the baler uses a single wrapping process for all bale wrap types, then the system is simple to operate, but the wrapping efficiency and bale integrity deteriorate due to inability to adapt to segmented or continuous wraps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adapt to different bale wrap typesVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system receives feedback from sensors that detect the bale wrap type (segmented or continuous) and automatically adjusts the wrapping process parameters. The sensor detects characteristics of the bale wrap material and provides signals to the controller, which then selects the appropriate wrapping process, enabling adaptive operation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different wrapping processes based on the detected bale wrap type. The controller can change operational parameters such as wrapping speed, tension, and cutting timing in real-time to match the specific requirements of segmented or continuous wraps, optimizing performance for each wrap type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the baler automatically detects and adapts to different bale wrap types, then wrapping efficiency and bale integrity improve, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrapping efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor-based feedback system automatically detects bale wrap type characteristics and provides real-time information to the controller, enabling the system to optimize wrapping parameters without manual input. This automated detection and response mechanism improves wrapping efficiency by ensuring the correct process is applied to each wrap type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment based on sensor detection, automatically selecting and executing the appropriate wrapping process without operator intervention. The controller monitors sensor signals and autonomously configures the wrapping parameters, reducing the need for manual configuration and improving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the baler uses manual operation for different wrap types, then the system is simpler, but the loss of time and operational efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtime for wrap type identification and process adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies the bale wrap type through sensor detection and self-adjusts the wrapping process parameters without requiring operator intervention. This self-service capability eliminates the time-consuming manual identification and configuration steps, significantly reducing operational cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system performs preliminary detection of the bale wrap type before the wrapping process begins, allowing the controller to pre-configure the appropriate wrapping parameters. This preliminary identification and setup occurs automatically in advance, preventing time losses during the actual wrapping operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12610892B2Control system for an agricultural baler
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 CNH IND CANADA
  • US12610892B2 patent drawing
  • US12610892B2 patent drawing
  • US12610892B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for an agricultural baler includes a controller configured to receive a bale wrap signal indicative of a type of a bale wrap. The controller is also configured to determine whether the bale wrap is segmented or continuous based on the type. Furthermore, the controller is configured to control a braking system to establish a tension force at a weakened section of the bale wrap sufficient to separate a first portion disposed about a bale from a second portion disposed about a shaft in response to determining the bale wrap is segmented and the weakened section is positioned between the shaft and the bale. In addition, the controller is configured to control a cutting system of the agricultural baler to cut the bale wrap in response to determining the bale wrap is continuous and a target section of the bale wrap is positioned at the cutting system.