Simplified Operator Interface for Automated Round Baler Wrapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural balers, especially smaller models, lack efficient automation for bale wrapping due to the absence of sophisticated control systems, making them less efficient and requiring complex tractor-mounted interfaces for operation.

Innovation Solution

An automatic bale wrapping control system with a simplified operator interface that includes mechanical switches for controlling wrapping functions, an audible alarm for feedback, and self-calibration capabilities, allowing for manual initiation and monitoring of the wrapping process without a visual display, enabling operation on less complex tractors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If sophisticated control systems with visual displays are installed on larger balers, then automation capability and operational efficiency are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential control functions from complex visual display systems and implements them through simple mechanical switches and audible feedback. The ECU processes wrapping control signals through basic switch inputs (first switch for extension/retraction, second switch for wrap cycle initiation) and provides feedback through audible alarm patterns, eliminating the need for sophisticated visual displays while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs inexpensive mechanical switches instead of expensive electronic control interfaces. The first and second switches are simple mechanical components that provide reliable input signals to the ECU without requiring complex electronics, visual displays, or sophisticated user interfaces, thereby reducing device complexity and cost while maintaining functional automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If sophisticated control systems are adapted to simpler implements lacking necessary features, then operational efficiency improvements are achieved, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ECU automatically performs calibration of the wrapping mechanism position sensors without requiring complex external calibration equipment or procedures. The system self-calibrates by receiving signals from the first switch during manual extension and retraction operations, automatically establishing reference positions for the wrapping mechanism. This self-service calibration eliminates the need for sophisticated calibration systems while enabling operational efficiency improvements on simpler implements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The simplified control system with mechanical switches and ECU processing is designed to be universally applicable across different baler models and sizes. The same basic switch configuration and ECU logic can control wrapping operations on various implements without requiring model-specific complex interfaces, thereby achieving operational efficiency improvements across an entire equipment line with consistent implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If manual operator input and monitoring are required for wrapping operations, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity and automation level decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator control capabilityVSAvoidwrapping cycle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous audible feedback through the alarm system that communicates wrapping cycle progress and system status to the operator. Different alarm patterns indicate different states (ready for operation, wrapping in progress, cycle complete, errors), allowing operators to monitor automated operations and make timely manual inputs without constant visual attention, thereby maintaining both ease of operation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The operator performs preliminary manual actions by operating the first switch to extend the wrapping mechanism to the desired position before initiating the automated wrap cycle with the second switch. The ECU then automatically executes the wrapping sequence without requiring continuous manual intervention, combining simple preliminary operator actions with automated execution to achieve both ease of operation and high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8011295B1Fully automated twine wrapping system for a round baler having a simplified operator interface
Publication Date: 2011.09.06 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US8011295B1 patent drawing
  • US8011295B1 patent drawing
  • US8011295B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated bale wrapping control system for a round baler that includes a simplified remotely installable operator interface for installation on a tractor. The simplified operator interface includes manual operated, mechanical input switches for selecting system on/off, number of wraps, twine or net wrapper selection, manual extension/retraction of the wrapping mechanism, and/or manual wrap cycle initiation. An audible alarm provides feedback to the operator for monitoring the baling and wrapping processes and for alerting the operator to abnormal conditions in the baling and/or wrapping processes.