Stacked Ball Bond Interconnects for RF Impedance Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for connecting circuit boards and MMICs face challenges in impedance matching, especially at higher frequencies, which can lead to time-consuming simulations and potential re-spins due to inaccuracies or mismatches.

Innovation Solution

The use of wire bonding equipment to form stacked balls, or stud bumps, with selected impedance characteristics, allowing for precise impedance matching and adjustment by varying the number and size of the balls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional simulation methods are used to match impedance for each trace, then impedance matching accuracy can be achieved, but the process becomes time consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpedance matching accuracyVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the ball bond interconnect by varying ball diameter, ball stack height, and wire diameter to achieve impedance matching. This eliminates the need for time-consuming simulations by directly adjusting physical dimensions to match impedance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the impedance matching function from the trace design and implements it separately through ball bond interconnect structures. This allows impedance matching to be achieved independently without requiring complex simulations of the entire signal path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If traditional simulation methods are used to model every interface, then accurate impedance matching can be achieved, but the device complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpedance matching accuracyVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the impedance matching function from the trace design and implements it separately through ball bond interconnect structures. This allows impedance matching to be achieved independently without requiring complex simulations of the entire signal path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the ball bond interconnect by varying ball diameter, ball stack height, and wire diameter to achieve impedance matching. This eliminates the need for time-consuming simulations by directly adjusting physical dimensions to match impedance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If fabrication errors result in out-of-specification connection impedance, then re-spins are required, but this increases time consumption and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection impedance specificationVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the ball bond interconnect dynamic and adjustable by varying ball diameter, ball stack height, and wire diameter. This allows for compensation of fabrication errors and achievement of compliant impedance matching without requiring re-spins, thereby maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Speed

If frequency is increased to improve signal transmission, then transmission speed improves, but impedance mismatch effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal transmission speedVSAvoidimpedance matching accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the ball bond interconnect by varying ball diameter, ball stack height, and wire diameter to achieve impedance matching. This eliminates the need for time-consuming simulations by directly adjusting physical dimensions to match impedance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12266629B2Ball bond impedance matching
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 RAYTHEON CO
  • US12266629B2 patent drawing
  • US12266629B2 patent drawing
  • US12266629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for providing an interconnection including a stack of wirebond balls having a selected impedance. The wirebond balls may have a size, which may comprise a radius, configured for the selected impedance. The stack may comprise a number of wirebond balls configured for the selected impedance and/or may comprise a material selected for the selected impedance. In embodiments, the selected impedance is primarily resistive (e.g., 50 Ohms), such that the overall reactance is minimized.