Two-Flute Ball End Mill Flank Geometry for Scratch-Free Finishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In machining extremely hard workpieces like cemented carbide, existing ball end mills face challenges in achieving high-quality machined surfaces due to issues such as deposited metals and scratches, especially near the rotation axis.

Innovation Solution

The ball end mill is designed with a configuration where the chisel edge front region is composed only of the first flank surface, eliminating the boundary portion between the first and second flank surfaces. This design reduces the likelihood of chips being pressed against the machined surface and improves cutting performance by minimizing wedge angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the groove wall surface shape is optimized for chip discharge (as in Patent Document 1), then chip discharge performance is improved and damages near the rotation axis are suppressed, but deposited metals occur on the machined surface in finishing operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip discharge performanceVSAvoidmachined surface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flank surface is divided into two distinct regions: a first flank surface with a smaller clearance angle for chip discharge, and a second flank surface with a larger clearance angle for producing high-quality machined surfaces. This segmentation allows each region to optimize its function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the flank surface are given different clearance angles tailored to their specific functions. The first flank surface near the chisel edge has a smaller clearance angle to facilitate chip discharge, while the second flank surface has a larger clearance angle to prevent deposited metals and improve surface finish.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the chisel edge shape and clearance angle are adjusted to improve surface finish (as in Patent Documents 2 and 3), then machined surface roughness is improved, but deposited metals or scratches may still occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachined surface roughnessVSAvoiddeposited metals and scratches
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flank surface is segmented into two zones with different clearance angles. The first flank surface handles chip discharge while the second flank surface, with its larger clearance angle, prevents deposited metals and scratches on the machined surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clearance angle parameter is changed across different regions of the flank surface. By increasing the clearance angle in the second flank surface region, the tool prevents deposited metals and scratches while maintaining effective chip discharge in the first flank surface region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single flank surface with uniform clearance angle is used, then the structure is simple, but it cannot simultaneously achieve good chip discharge and high-quality surface finish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflank surface structureVSAvoidmachined surface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flank surface is divided into two distinct surfaces with different clearance angles. This segmentation enables the tool to simultaneously achieve effective chip discharge and high-quality surface finish, overcoming the limitations of a uniform clearance angle design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the flank surface are assigned different clearance angle values. The first flank surface has a smaller clearance angle optimized for chip discharge, while the second flank surface has a larger clearance angle optimized for surface finish quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250178101A1Ball end mill
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 MOLDINO TOOL ENG LTD
  • US20250178101A1 patent drawing
  • US20250178101A1 patent drawing
  • US20250178101A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A two-flute ball end mill includes a cutting edge that is formed at an intersection ridge line between a groove wall surface of a gash groove and a flank surface; and the flank surface includes a first flank surface that forms a chisel edge and a second flank surface that extends from the first flank surface to a rear side in a rotation direction with a larger clearance angle. In a case where, as seen from a tip side in an axial direction, an intersection point between one cutting edge of two cutting edges and the chisel edge is defined as a first intersection point, and an intersection point between a flank surface boundary line between the first flank surface and the second flank surface of the other cutting edge of the cutting edges and the groove wall surface is defined as a second intersection point.