Clamping Chuck Pullout Prevention Using Ball-Head Locking Grooves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tool holders with clamping chucks experience axial migration of rotating tools due to vibrations during machining, leading to precision issues and safety hazards, as the tools can become loose or even exit the chuck.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of a pullout preventer with locking elements and grooves, featuring a ball head profile, which engages upon tool insertion and provides a torque-proof, axially fixed connection, preventing migration through a form-locking mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a clamping chuck is used to hold rotating tools, then the tool can be securely clamped torque-proof, but axial migration of the tool occurs during operation due to vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque-proof clampingVSAvoidaxial position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into multiple independent locking elements (at least two locking elements) distributed around the circumference, each engaging with corresponding locking grooves. This segmentation provides multiple discrete points of axial restraint, preventing tool migration while maintaining torque-proof clamping through the distributed locking architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking elements are nested within the chuck body, with locking grooves formed in recesses that receive the locking elements. The tool shaft contains corresponding grooves that engage these nested locking elements, creating a hierarchical nested structure where the locking mechanism is integrated within the chuck rather than adding external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Stability of the object's composition

If locking elements and grooves are added to prevent axial migration, then axial stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial position stabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking elements are merged with the chuck body as integral components, and the locking grooves are formed directly in the chuck structure rather than being separate parts. This merging eliminates the need for additional separate locking components, reducing assembly complexity while providing effective axial stabilization through the integrated locking geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking elements serve multiple functions: they prevent axial migration of the tool, provide torque transmission paths, and can be designed to facilitate tool insertion through their geometric configuration. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, simplifying the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the locking grooves are made wider to facilitate easier insertion, then the ease of operation improves, but the precision of the locking engagement may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool insertion easeVSAvoidlocking engagement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The locking grooves are configured with varying widths along their length, creating a dynamic engagement profile. The grooves are wider at the insertion end to guide and accommodate the locking elements during tool insertion, then taper or narrow toward the locking end to provide precise engagement and prevent axial migration. This dynamic geometric transition balances ease of insertion with precise locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures precise machining by preventing axial migration of tools, reducing scrap and accident risks, while maintaining tool security within the chuck during operation.

Implementation Method 1

They are being used for clamping tubular tools, turning tools, milling tools, reaming tools, and grinding tools, and similar through a thermally induced shrink process. Typically, such shrink fit chucks are thermally heated by an inductive shrink system, whereby the inner diameter of the shrink fit chuck is expanded.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

the inner diameter of the shrink fit chuck is expanded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

In order to avoid scatter flux and to concentrate the magnetic flux, magnetic flux concentration elements made of soft magnetic electrically substantially non-conductive material, like e.g. ferrite or similar, are disposed at the faces and at the outer circumference of the coil assembly, which direct the magnetic flux generated by the coil assembly to the sleeve section of the tool holder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10898959B2Means for preventing tools from being pulled out from tool holders with a tool holding fixture
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 FRANZ HAIMER MASCHINENBAU KG
  • US10898959B2 patent drawing
  • US10898959B2 patent drawing
  • US10898959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a tool holder with a tool holding fixture, in particular a clamping chuck such as a contracting chuck, a draw-in collect chuck, a hydraulic expanding chuck and a high-precision chuck, and a shank of a tool, in particular a rotary tool, accommodated in it, wherein the tool holder contains a means for preventing the tool from being pulled out, locking it against axial displacement. This pull-out preventing unit comprises at least one locking element and at least one locking groove, which corresponds to the said locking element, receives it and interacts with it in a positively locking manner. In this case, both the locking element and the locking groove are formed at least partly in the manner of a ball head. Preferably, the tool has the locking grooves. On account of preferably spirally arranged locking grooves along the cylindrical shank of rotary tools, the direction of pitch of which grooves corresponds to the direction of the grooves of the tool, axial locking of the tool is obtained, so that the tool cannot be axially displaced from the tool holder during operation. In addition, force-exerting elements are arranged, with the effect of making the tool lie against the pull-out preventer without play after shrink-fitting.