Ball Ramp Brake Central Spring Return Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior ball ramp brakes face complexity and inefficiency due to multiple springs in the return mechanism and directional bias in braking torque, leading to uneven wear and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

A ball ramp brake design featuring a central spring to provide axially aligned return force, eliminating the need for multiple springs and incorporating an annular roller bearing to prevent rotational torque transfer, ensuring consistent braking force regardless of shaft rotation direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple springs are used in the return mechanism, then the rotatable actuator can be returned to the unactuated state, but the device complexity increases and the return force becomes uneven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn mechanism functionalityVSAvoidspring arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate springs are merged into a single central spring that provides the return force. The patent replaces the plurality of outwardly spaced springs with one centrally located spring that acts on the rotatable actuator, simplifying the return mechanism while maintaining its functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The return mechanism is segmented into a central spring component that works in conjunction with a cable assembly. The cable assembly is divided into a stationary portion and a rotatable portion, allowing the spring to act centrally while the cable transmits the force to rotate the actuator back to its unactuated position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple springs are used in the return mechanism, then the rotatable actuator can be returned to the unactuated state, but the manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn mechanism functionalityVSAvoidspring pre-tensioning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate springs are merged into a single central spring that provides the return force. The patent replaces the plurality of outwardly spaced springs with one centrally located spring that acts on the rotatable actuator, simplifying the return mechanism while maintaining its functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If stationary discs are coupled to housing via pins with clearance, then the disc assembly can slide axially, but rotational feedback occurs causing directional bias in braking torque

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisc assembly axial movementVSAvoidbraking torque consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A bearing is introduced as an intermediary element between the rotatable actuator and the disc assembly. This bearing prevents rotational feedback from the disc assembly from being transmitted back to the rotatable actuator, thereby eliminating the directional bias in braking torque while still allowing axial movement of the disc assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Force

If friction exists between rotatable actuator and stationary disc, then the actuator can apply axial force to the disc assembly, but braking efficiency is reduced due to force absorption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial force transmissionVSAvoidbraking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing provides a controlled amount of rotational play that allows the rotatable actuator to rotate slightly without transferring excessive rotational friction to the disc assembly. This partial rotation capability reduces energy loss while still maintaining effective axial force transmission for braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The central spring design simplifies the return mechanism, reduces wear, and eliminates directional bias, resulting in improved braking efficiency and consistent braking force across different rotation directions.

Implementation Method 1

a spring under compression positioned centrally about the axis and adapted to bias the rotatable actuator toward the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an annular roller bearing positioned between the rotatable actuator and the disc assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP1801449B1Ball ramp brake
Publication Date: 2012.08.01 LAMBERT BRAKE CORPORATION
  • EP1801449B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1801449B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1801449B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A brake (10) for applying a braking force to a shaft includes a housing (11) which defines a chamber (17). The housing (11) includes a plurality of depressions (19) which are circumferentially spaced around an axis (22). A rotatable actuator (40) is received in the chamber (17) and includes a plurality of depressions (43) circumferentially spaced around the axis (22). The housing depressions (19) face the rotatable actuator depressions (43) and each matching pair of depressions receive a ball (23) therebetween. A spring (50) under compression is positioned centrally about the axis (22). A bearing (56) is interposed between the rotatable actuator (40) and disc assembly (70). When the rotatable actuator (40) is rotated, the balls (23) roll along the depressions (19, 43) to gradually shallower portions thereof. This in turn moves the rotatable actuator (40) axially away from the housing (11), thereby applying a braking force to the shaft. The spring (50) compressively opposes the axial movement of the rotatable actuator (40) away from the housing (11). Further, the inclusion of the bearing (56) between the rotatable actuator (40) and the disc assembly (70) minimizes frictional effects and rotational feedback during brake actuation.