Ballot Drop Box with Automated Weight Detection and Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drop boxes for voting ballots lack effective control and verification mechanisms to prevent and detect 'stuffing' fraud, where multiple ballots are illegally deposited, making it impossible to identify and separate illegal from legal ballots.

Innovation Solution

A ballot drop box with a scale and chute system that determines the weight of deposited ballots, using a motor and controller to direct them into either an 'acceptable' or 'further investigation needed' bin, and optional marking and door control mechanisms to prevent and detect fraudulent submissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple drop box is used to allow voter deposit, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to detect multiple ballot stuffing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of ballot depositVSAvoidballot verification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection of ballots with an automated optical scanning system. The scanner uses image capture devices and pattern recognition algorithms to automatically detect multiple ballots, eliminating the need for manual counting while maintaining ease of deposit. This substitution of mechanical/manual verification with automated optical detection resolves the contradiction by providing reliable detection without complicating the deposit process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary scanning mechanism between the ballot deposit and final counting processes. The scanner acts as a mediator that intercepts ballots as they enter the box, verifies them optically, and flags potential fraud before ballots are fully deposited. This intermediary verification layer maintains ease of operation while improving reliability through automated detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual inspection of ballots is performed, then measurement precision of ballot count is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming verification process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballot count accuracyVSAvoidballot processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual ballot counting and inspection with an automated optical scanning system that processes ballots at high speed. The scanner uses rapid image capture and automated pattern recognition to verify each ballot in seconds, achieving both high measurement precision in detecting multiple ballots and high productivity in processing volume. This eliminates the trade-off by automating the verification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous scanning and verification as ballots are deposited, rather than batch processing after collection. The optical scanner operates continuously, capturing and analyzing each ballot in real-time as it enters the box, maintaining both precision in detection and productivity in processing speed through uninterrupted automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multiple ballots are allowed to be deposited simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but object-generated harmful factors worsen due to stuffing fraud

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballot deposit efficiencyVSAvoidmultiple ballot fraud
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an optical scanning intermediary that intercepts and verifies ballots during the deposit process. The scanner detects multiple ballots even when deposited simultaneously by analyzing the optical characteristics and spacing of ballots as they enter the box. This intermediary verification maintains productivity by allowing simultaneous deposits while eliminating the harmful effect of fraud through automated detection and flagging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the optical scanner continuously monitors deposited ballots and provides immediate verification results. When multiple ballots are detected, the system generates alerts and flags the deposit for investigation, creating a feedback loop that maintains productivity while preventing fraud through real-time detection and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If a scale-based detection system is used, then measurement precision of ballot weight is improved, but device complexity worsens due to additional mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballot weight detectionVSAvoidscale mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical scale-based weight detection with an optical scanning system that measures ballot characteristics through light interaction. The optical system captures images and analyzes ballot density, thickness, and other physical properties without requiring mechanical contact or weighing mechanisms. This substitution maintains measurement precision for detecting multiple ballots while eliminating the complexity of mechanical scale components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the control and verification of remote balloting by accurately distinguishing single from multiple ballot deposits, preventing fraud and ensuring only valid ballots are counted, while discouraging illegal activities through enhanced security measures.

Implementation Method 1

Within the drop box is a scale which collects the deposited ballot from the chute. The scale determines if a single ballot has been deposited or multiple ballots.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeight measurement:

Implementation Method 2

Once the weight of the ballot has been determined, the scale is tipped one way or the other to deposit the ballot(s) into the proper bin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical tilting:

Data Source

PatentUS11776344B1Ballot drop box
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 OGRAM MARK
  • US11776344B1 patent drawing
  • US11776344B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A ballot drop box adapted to collect voting ballots. The drop box is a shell having an interior and an exterior. A chute is used by the voter to deposit their ballot. Within the drop box is a scale which collects the deposited ballot from the chute. The scale determines if a single ballot has been deposited or multiple ballots. Based on this determination, the ballot(s) are sent to an “acceptable” bin within the box or to a “further investigation needed” bin. An alternative embodiment marks the she submitted ballot(s) allowing a later determination if the ballots have been “stuffed”.