Bandwidth Manager Shadow Request Queue Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bandwidth management systems for input/output devices are inefficient due to suboptimal scheduling decisions, leading to delays for high-priority applications and wastage of bandwidth, especially when actual bandwidth requirements differ from requested times and I/O device throughput varies over time.

Innovation Solution

A bandwidth manager issues shadow requests based on statistical duration calculations for future I/O operations, reserving queue positions and adjusting actual requests accordingly to optimize bandwidth allocation and utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If I/O requests are handled in queue order with priority-based scheduling, then high-priority applications can access the I/O device, but low-priority applications that queued earlier may cause delays for high-priority applications

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveI/O operation throughputVSAvoidQueue waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating shadow requests that reserve queue positions in advance based on statistical analysis of historical I/O patterns. This allows the system to prepare scheduling decisions beforehand, reducing actual queue waiting time while maintaining fair allocation for both high and low-priority applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring actual I/O operation durations and using this data to refine statistical models. This feedback loop enables more accurate prediction of future I/O requirements, improving scheduling accuracy and reducing unnecessary queue delays over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If bandwidth is allocated based on requested time periods, then applications receive guaranteed bandwidth, but I/O device bandwidth is wasted when actual usage is less than requested

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBandwidth guaranteeVSAvoidBandwidth wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes bandwidth allocation parameters by adjusting shadow request durations based on statistical analysis of actual I/O usage patterns. Instead of static bandwidth guarantees, the system adapts allocation parameters to match actual needs, ensuring reliability while minimizing wastage through data-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by allocating bandwidth based on statistically determined actual usage rather than full requested amounts. Shadow requests are created with durations that match historical patterns, providing sufficient bandwidth for reliable operation while avoiding excessive allocation that would lead to wastage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If static bandwidth allocation rules are used, then scheduling is simple to implement, but the system cannot adapt to varying I/O device throughput due to fragmentation, hardware degradation, or partial failure

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveScheduling implementation simplicityVSAvoidBandwidth allocation adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamics by transitioning from static bandwidth allocation rules to dynamic shadow request generation based on statistical analysis. The scheduling mechanism adapts to changing I/O device conditions by continuously updating statistical models, maintaining ease of operation through automated adaptation rather than complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically adjusting bandwidth allocation based on monitored performance data without requiring external intervention. The statistical analysis and shadow request generation occur autonomously, allowing the system to adapt to hardware degradation, fragmentation, or failure conditions while maintaining simple operation for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8060660B2Adaptive bandwidth distribution system for high-performance input/output devices with variable throughput
Publication Date: 2011.11.15 AUTODESK INC
  • US8060660B2 patent drawing
  • US8060660B2 patent drawing
  • US8060660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for issuing shadow requests to manage bandwidth allocation between an application that issues input/output (I/O) operation requests and an I/O device. A bandwidth manager detects the completion of an I/O operation, which includes either a read operation or a write operation. The bandwidth manager calculates a statistical duration for future I/O operations between the application and the I/O device based on throughput statistics related to past I/O operations. The bandwidth manager generates a shadow request for reserving a position in a queue that stores pending I/O requests for the I/O device for a first future I/O operation request from the application and having a duration related to the statistical duration, and inserts the shadow request into the queue. Advantageously, applications that do not make frequent I/O operation requests in advance may still execute I/O operations because bandwidth is reserved for future I/O operation requests via the shadow requests.