Barb Geometry Reduces Peak Strain for Fatigue Life

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anchoring barbs for implantable medical devices in body vessels experience premature fracture due to cyclic loading from hemodynamic forces, leading to fatigue failure and reduced durability.

Innovation Solution

The design of the barb features a non-constant radius of curvature for the base portion and a substantially straight tip portion, distributing strain over a larger region, with the base portion extending over 25-50% of the penetrating element's length, reducing peak principal strain and enhancing fatigue life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the barb uses a conventional geometry with constant curvature, then the manufacturing is simple, but the fatigue life is short due to stress concentration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue lifeVSAvoidgeometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barb employs different geometric characteristics in different regions: the base portion has a first curvature with a larger radius of curvature to reduce stress concentration, while the tip portion has a second curvature with a smaller radius of curvature for effective tissue penetration. This local differentiation of geometric properties allows the structure to optimize both fatigue resistance and anchoring function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The barb is divided into distinct segments: a base portion and a tip portion, each with specific geometric characteristics. The base portion extends from the body portion and has different curvature properties than the tip portion, creating segmented zones that perform different functions - the base portion resists fatigue while the tip portion penetrates tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the base portion is made longer to distribute strain, then the fatigue life increases, but the overall device length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue lifeVSAvoidpenetrating element length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the radius of curvature parameter in the base portion to achieve better strain distribution. By adjusting the curvature radius rather than simply extending the base portion length, the design distributes stress more effectively while controlling the overall length of the penetrating element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the barb uses a straight tip portion, then the strain distribution improves, but the anchoring penetration capability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue lifeVSAvoidpenetration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tip portion maintains a curved geometry with a smaller radius of curvature to preserve tissue penetration capability, while the base portion has a larger radius of curvature to improve strain distribution. This local differentiation ensures that each region performs its intended function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2358300B1Barb for anchoring an implantable medical device within a body vessel
Publication Date: 2016.02.17 COOK MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP2358300B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2358300B1 patent drawingFigure 3A
  • EP2358300B1 patent drawingFigure 3B

AI summary

A barb for anchoring an implantable medical device to a body vessel comprises a thin-walled body portion for engagement with a structural element of an implantable medical device and a penetrating element extending from the body portion. The body portion has a longitudinal axis. The penetrating element includes a tip portion for anchoring into tissue and a base portion between the tip portion and the body portion. In a deployed configuration of the barb, the base portion curves away from the longitudinal axis at a first curvature and the tip portion curves toward the longitudinal axis at a second curvature which is opposite in sign from the first.