Barbed Suture Loop Anchoring Tissue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional surgical sutures require knot tying, which increases procedure time and may leave bulk material at the wound site, and have lower holding forces in less elastic tissues, such as those of diabetic or immunocompromised patients, due to oversized needles and insufficient suture filling of penetration holes.

Innovation Solution

A suture with a proximal elongate body and a distal loop featuring barbs and bifurcation, where the branches are advanced through tissue penetration points to increase holding force, and an end effector limits loop movement, preventing further penetration and securing the suture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional sutures use knot tying to secure tissue, then the suture can be secured in tissue, but the procedure time increases and bulk material is left at the wound site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuture securingVSAvoidprocedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the knot-tying step from the suturing process by incorporating pre-formed barbs directly on the suture material. The barbs are integrated into the suture body, allowing the suture to secure tissue through the barb mechanism alone without requiring separate knot tying actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The suture with barbs is self-securing through its own structural features. As the suture is passed through tissue, the barbs automatically engage with the tissue to prevent withdrawal, providing self-service securing without requiring external knot tying operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If conventional sutures use oversized needles for given suture diameter, then the suture can be inserted through tissue, but a larger hole is left at the needle penetration point reducing holding force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuture insertionVSAvoidsuture holding force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The barbs are pre-formed on the suture material before insertion. As the suture is advanced through tissue, these pre-formed barbs immediately engage with the tissue walls, providing preliminary anchoring that prevents needle hole enlargement and maintains holding force throughout the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the suture by adding barbs with specific geometries (angles, lengths, spacing) that optimize tissue engagement. These parameter changes allow the suture to achieve secure holding force with smaller needle diameters, as the barbs compensate for reduced suture-diameter mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional sutures are used in patients with less elastic tissue, then the suture can be inserted, but the holding force is reduced due to longer healing profiles and less compliant tissue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue compliance adaptationVSAvoidsuture holding force
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The barbs provide localized mechanical engagement points along the suture path. This local quality enhancement allows the suture to achieve secure holding in specific tissue regions without requiring overall tissue elasticity. The barbs create localized anchoring zones that work effectively even in stiff, less compliant tissues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The suture combines the base suture material with integrated barb structures, creating a composite anchoring system. This composite design provides both the flexibility needed for insertion and the mechanical engagement capability required for strong holding in less elastic tissues, adapting to various tissue compliance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The described suture design enhances holding force in tissue and reduces material left at the wound site by using barbed branches and an end effector to secure the suture, improving tissue anchoring and reducing healing time.

Implementation Method 1

at least a portion of the loop includes a plurality of barbs... the two branches of the anchoring device further includes barbs on a surface thereof and these barbs may secure the two branches in the body tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

an end effector limits loop movement, preventing further penetration and securing the suture... the end effector engages the tissue to prevent movement of the loop in a proximal direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS8932327B2Anchoring device
Publication Date: 2015.01.13 COVIDIEN LP
  • US8932327B2 patent drawing
  • US8932327B2 patent drawing
  • US8932327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anchoring device having an elongate body at a proximal portion, a distal portion of the elongate body forming a loop at a distal portion of the anchoring device. The loop further includes a plurality of anchors disposed along a surface thereof and the loop also including an end effector. Methods for securing anchoring devices of the present disclosure are also disclosed.