Barcode Maintenance Tracking for Equipment Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current maintenance systems for complex equipment like elevators, HVAC systems, and boilers lack integrated scheduling and verification protocols, leading to unnecessary maintenance, unscheduled downtime, and increased costs due to inadequate resource allocation and confirmation of maintenance completion.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing barcodes and image capturing devices to associate procedures with equipment components, track maintenance steps, confirm completion, and generate reports, ensuring documented and systematic maintenance processes aligned with specific equipment needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predetermined maintenance schedules are established for all components, then equipment reliability is improved, but maintenance costs increase due to unnecessary maintenance on components that do not require frequent service

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from uniform maintenance schedules to component-specific maintenance requirements. Each component is evaluated individually to determine its actual maintenance needs based on factors such as criticality, failure rates, and operational conditions. This allows the system to apply different maintenance frequencies and types to different components, avoiding unnecessary maintenance on components that do not require frequent service while ensuring adequate maintenance for critical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting maintenance schedules based on multiple parameters including component criticality, historical failure data, operational intensity, and environmental conditions. The system continuously monitors and re-evaluates these parameters to optimize maintenance intervals, transforming static predetermined schedules into dynamic, data-driven maintenance plans that adapt to actual equipment performance and conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive maintenance protocols are implemented for all equipment components, then equipment safety is improved, but system complexity increases due to the need to track and verify multiple maintenance procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the maintenance management system to automatically generate, assign, track, and verify maintenance protocols without requiring extensive manual intervention. The system automatically schedules maintenance tasks, notifies relevant personnel, tracks completion status, and updates equipment records. This automation reduces the administrative burden and complexity of managing comprehensive maintenance protocols while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring maintenance completion status, equipment performance, and safety metrics. The system provides real-time feedback to stakeholders about maintenance progress, compliance status, and any deviations from prescribed protocols. This feedback loop enables proactive management of maintenance activities and allows for rapid response to any safety concerns or protocol violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If manual tracking methods are used for maintenance completion, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but information accuracy deteriorates due to lack of verification and documentation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidmaintenance completion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual tracking mechanisms with an integrated digital information system that automatically captures, stores, and verifies maintenance completion data. The system uses electronic records, digital checklists, and automated verification processes to replace paper-based or manual tracking methods. This substitution maintains ease of implementation through user-friendly interfaces while dramatically improving information accuracy through automated data capture and verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary maintenance management system that acts as a mediator between maintenance personnel, equipment, and stakeholders. This intermediary system standardizes the reporting and verification process, ensuring that maintenance completion information is consistently captured and verified regardless of who performs the maintenance. The system serves as a central repository and validation point for all maintenance data, improving accuracy without adding significant complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If frequent maintenance is performed on all components, then equipment efficiency is improved, but productivity decreases due to increased downtime for maintenance activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment efficiencyVSAvoidmaintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively scheduling and performing maintenance tasks before equipment failures occur. The system uses predictive analytics and component condition monitoring to identify when maintenance is truly needed, allowing planning and execution of maintenance activities in advance during planned downtime rather than reacting to failures. This approach optimizes the timing of maintenance to minimize impact on productivity while ensuring equipment efficiency is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making maintenance schedules flexible and adaptive rather than rigid and uniform. The system continuously adjusts maintenance frequencies and timing based on actual equipment performance, operational intensity, and predicted failure risks. This dynamic approach allows the system to perform maintenance more frequently on components that need it and less frequently on components that are performing well, optimizing the balance between equipment efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11282301B2Method and system for systematic maintenance of mechanical and electrical equipment
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 BUILDING OPTICS LLC
  • US11282301B2 patent drawing
  • US11282301B2 patent drawing
  • US11282301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for monitoring procedures performed on equipment, the method comprising; associating a plurality of barcodes, wherein each of the barcodes is associated with one of a plurality of components, wherein the plurality of components are associated with a piece of equipment, establishing at least one procedure associated with each of the plurality of barcodes relative to the associated component, identifying a first barcode scanned by an image capturing device, identifying at least one procedure associated with the first barcode, providing, at least one or more steps associated with the at least one procedure, receiving confirmation of the at least one procedure to be performed, determining the confirmation of the completion of at least one step of the at least one procedure, processing if the identified procedure has been completed, and generating a report based on the completed identified procedure.