Bare Die Package Displacement Constraint for Warpage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bare die packages experience excessive substrate warpage due to thermal expansion mismatch between the die and package substrate, leading to improper electrical contact and potential damage to the die when secured between a socket and heat sink, as they lack the structural support provided by an integrated heat spreader.

Innovation Solution

A displacement constraint, such as a plurality of rigid members or a frame, is fixedly attached to the package substrate or heat sink to provide structural support and prevent excessive substrate warpage, minimizing thermal expansion-induced bending.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a bare die package is secured between a socket and heat sink, then thermal management is achieved, but excessive substrate warpage occurs due to thermal expansion mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal managementVSAvoidsubstrate warpage
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A displacement constraint structure is introduced as an intermediary element between the package substrate and the heat sink. This constraint acts as a mediator that prevents the substrate from warping during thermal cycling while still allowing effective heat transfer from the die to the heat sink.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the mechanical parameters of the packaging system by adding a displacement constraint that limits the substrate's degree of freedom. This constraint modifies the thermal-mechanical behavior of the system, preventing excessive warpage while maintaining thermal management functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If an integrated heat spreader is added to provide structural support, then substrate warpage is minimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate warpageVSAvoidpackage structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the necessary structural support function from the integrated heat spreader concept. Instead of adding a full IHS assembly, a simplified displacement constraint is used that provides the essential warpage prevention functionality without the additional complexity of a complete heat spreader structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The displacement constraint is applied locally at critical positions on the package substrate rather than using a comprehensive IHS structure. This localized approach provides sufficient structural support to prevent warpage while minimizing the addition of complex components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If a compressible gasket is placed between the package substrate and heat sink, then some structural support is provided, but sufficient structural support is still lacking to prevent warpage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate warpageVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a compressible gasket that relies on compression to provide support, the invention uses a rigid displacement constraint that actively prevents displacement. This inverts the approach from passive compression-based support to active constraint-based support, providing significantly stronger structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The displacement constraint effectively minimizes substrate warpage, ensuring stable electrical contact and reducing the risk of damage to the package substrate and die by providing adequate structural support during assembly.

Implementation Method 1

Die 110 and package substrate 120 are typically made from different materials, and hence both have different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE). At the package assembly process, the die 110 does not expand as much as the package substrate 120, thus causing the package substrate 120 to bend away from the die 110

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS7888790B2Bare die package with displacement constraint
Publication Date: 2011.02.15 INTEL CORP
  • US7888790B2 patent drawing
  • US7888790B2 patent drawing
  • US7888790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention describe a bare die package and its methods of fabrication. The bare die package comprises a die electrically coupled to a package substrate, and a displacement constraint. In an embodiment of the present invention, the displacement constraint is a plurality of members fixedly attached onto the package substrate and surrounds the die. When the bare die package is secured between a socket and a heat sink, the plurality of members provide structural support to the package substrate and prevent excessive substrate warpage.