Barrel Processor Thread Scheduling via Hazard Lookahead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In chiplet systems, threads in a barrel processor often progress unnecessarily through the pipeline before detecting memory contention issues, leading to wasted cycles and energy due to the lack of lookahead signals for cache and memory state, resulting in inefficient thread execution and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A control mechanism is introduced to propagate information about the processor cache and memory request state backwards through the pipeline, allowing earlier detection of unsafe memory access requests and enabling quicker rescheduling of threads, thereby optimizing thread execution and reducing resource wastage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If threads progress through the pipeline without lookahead signals, then the pipeline can operate continuously, but threads detect memory contention issues late leading to wasted cycles and energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread execution efficiencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a lookahead mechanism that checks cache and memory state information before threads fully commit to pipeline operations. By performing preliminary checks of hazard indication entries that correspond to thread states, the system can identify potential memory contention issues before they cause actual conflicts, allowing threads to be rescheduled earlier and avoiding wasted pipeline cycles and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where hazard indication entries are read and processed to determine thread scheduling decisions. The system continuously monitors cache and memory state, feeds this information back to the thread scheduling circuitry, and adjusts thread execution accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic thread rescheduling based on real-time memory state, improving execution efficiency and reducing energy waste from unsuccessful memory operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If threads progress through the pipeline without lookahead signals, then the pipeline maintains continuous operation, but memory contention issues are detected late causing wasted cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidthread execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary checks of hazard indication entries before threads complete their pipeline progression. By evaluating cache and memory state information in advance, the system can identify threads that are likely to encounter memory contention and reschedule them before they waste pipeline cycles. This preliminary action reduces the effective execution time of threads while maintaining overall pipeline throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the pipeline to skip over threads that are identified as having potential memory contention issues. By reading hazard indication entries and detecting unsafe memory access requests early, the system can rush through or reschedule problematic threads before they block the pipeline, thereby reducing wasted cycles and maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Reliability

If lookahead signals for cache and memory state are added, then thread execution efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread execution efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces hazard indication entries as intermediary data structures that mediate between the complex cache and memory state and the thread scheduling decisions. These entries serve as a simplified interface, storing only the essential hazard information needed for scheduling decisions. This intermediary layer reduces the complexity of the control mechanism by abstracting away the full complexity of cache and memory state while still enabling efficient thread execution through lookahead signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of energy

If hazard indication entries are read and threads are rescheduled earlier, then power consumption is reduced, but additional control logic is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower drawVSAvoidthread scheduling circuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses hazard indication entries as intermediaries that simplify the control logic for thread rescheduling. By storing pre-computed hazard information in these entries, the system avoids the need for complex real-time analysis of cache and memory state during scheduling decisions. This intermediary structure reduces power consumption by enabling faster, simpler scheduling decisions while minimizing the complexity of the thread scheduling circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220121483A1Thread execution control in a barrel processor
Publication Date: 2022.04.21 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20220121483A1 patent drawing
  • US20220121483A1 patent drawing
  • US20220121483A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and techniques for thread execution control in a barrel processor are described herein. An apparatus includes a barrel processor, which includes local memory including a hazard data structure; and thread scheduling circuitry; wherein the barrel processor is configured to perform operations through use of the thread scheduling circuitry, the operations including: identifying an instruction to place into a pipeline for the barrel processor, the instruction corresponding to a thread; reading a hazard indication entry from a hazard data structure, the hazard indication entry corresponding to the thread, and wherein the hazard indication entry is set by a preceding instruction in the thread; and in response to reading the hazard indication entry, rescheduling the thread to a later time based on the hazard identification.