Barrier Boom Balance Mechanism Without Counterweights

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional level crossing barrier systems rely on bulky counterweights, which occupy significant space and pose risks to passers-by and technicians, especially in adverse weather conditions.

Innovation Solution

The barrier mechanism employs a set of mechanical elements, including steel cams, chains, forks, and compression springs, to achieve static and dynamic balance of the boom, eliminating the need for counterweights and reducing the working space required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional bulky counterweights are used to balance the boom, then the balance system is reliable and well-established, but the working space occupied increases and safety risks to passers-by and technicians arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalance system reliabilityVSAvoidworking space occupied
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the counterweight component from the barrier system entirely. Instead of using traditional counterweights to balance the boom, the invention employs a spring-based balancing mechanism that eliminates the need for heavy counterweight structures, thereby reducing the working space occupied while maintaining balance functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical counterweight system with a spring-based mechanical system. The spring mechanism provides the necessary balancing force through elastic deformation rather than gravitational force from counterweights, fundamentally changing the mechanical approach to achieving boom balance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional bulky counterweights are used to balance the boom, then the balance function is achieved, but safety risks to passers-by and technicians increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalance functionVSAvoidsafety risks to passers-by and technicians
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the counterweight component entirely and replacing it with a compact spring mechanism, the patent eliminates the safety hazards associated with heavy moving masses near the barrier boom, thereby protecting passers-by and technicians while maintaining the essential balance function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the balancing system from using large mass (counterweights) to using elastic force (springs). This parameter change reduces the moving mass in the system, thereby minimizing safety risks while preserving the balance function through alternative physical principles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If counterweight size is increased to handle longer booms, then the balance capability improves, but space occupancy and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalance capabilityVSAvoidspace occupancy
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the gravitational force mechanism of counterweights with the elastic force mechanism of springs. This allows the balance capability to be adjusted by changing spring parameters (stiffness, pre-compression) rather than increasing mass, enabling longer booms to be balanced without increasing space occupancy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes in the spring system (such as spring constant, number of springs, pre-compression force) to achieve the necessary balance capability for longer booms, avoiding the need to increase the physical size of balancing components and thereby reducing space occupancy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides stable and reliable operation of the boom, reducing the risk of material damage and physical harm to individuals, while also minimizing space occupancy and enhancing performance in adverse weather.

Implementation Method 1

a set of compression springs which, when compressed have the function of compensating the moment of force caused by the boom on the main shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a set of compression springs which, when compressed have the function of compensating the moment of force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP4253191B1Barrier mechanism
Publication Date: 2025.03.05 EFACEC ENGENHARIA E SISTEMAS
  • EP4253191B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4253191B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4253191B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8

AI summary

The present application describes a barrier mechanism for level crossing control systems. This new mechanism presents a set of differentiated requirements and solutions, whereby the main distinctive characteristic is the boom balance system which does not use the conventional counterweights, resulting in a reduction in the operational space of the barrier, avoiding possible accidents with workers and passers-by, minimizing as well the material damages. To achieve the indicated objective, guaranteeing the balance and stability in the movement of the boom a set of compression springs is used which exert more, or less, force on the main shaft according to the position in which the boom is found. Another important characteristic of the barrier lies in the mechanics and the transmission systems used, which present high levels of reliability.