Barrier-Separated Pulsating Heat Exchanger for Electronic Enclosures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heat exchangers for electronic enclosures face challenges in efficiently cooling systems where ambient temperatures are lower than internal temperatures, especially in environments contaminated with dust, liquids, or gases, and are prone to corrosion, leading to inefficiencies and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

A heat exchanger design featuring a pulsating heat pipe with a barrier separating the condenser and evaporator sides, using a single metallic material for corrosion resistance and a serpentine configuration of channels filled with a two-phase refrigerant, which enhances heat transfer efficiency and reduces volume while preventing contamination ingress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional heat exchanger design is used in contaminated environments, then cooling function is provided, but corrosion and contamination ingress lead to reduced reliability and increased complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidprotection structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is divided into separate evaporator and condenser sides with a barrier between them, allowing independent protection strategies for each side. The barrier segments the internal structure to prevent contamination ingress while maintaining cooling functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The material parameters are changed by using corrosion-resistant materials and modifying the structural parameters through the barrier design. This allows the heat exchanger to withstand corrosive environments without requiring complex external protection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a barrier is introduced to separate condenser and evaporator sides, then contamination ingress is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination protectionVSAvoidbarrier structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is merged with the internal structure of the heat exchanger, combining the separation function with the structural framework. This integration reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall design while maintaining effective contamination protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Volume of moving object

If volume is reduced for compactness, then space efficiency improves, but heat transfer efficiency may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchanger volumeVSAvoidcooling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger channels are arranged in a nested or compact configuration where the evaporator and condenser pathways are closely integrated. This nesting allows maximum heat transfer surface area within minimum volume, achieving both compactness and high cooling capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat transfer surfaces are arranged in multiple dimensions rather than simple linear extensions. By utilizing three-dimensional space efficiently with stacked or layered channel arrangements, the heat exchanger achieves high cooling capacity in a compact volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves a higher specific cooling capacity, reduces volume by up to 62%, and is more cost-effective and compact, maintaining performance in various orientations and corrosive environments.

Implementation Method 1

a serpentine configuration of channels filled with a two-phase refrigerant, which enhances heat transfer efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

The heat exchanger comprises a heat exchanging element which is configured as a pulsating heat pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

The heat exchanger comprises a heat exchanging element which is configured as a pulsating heat pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

a serpentine configuration of channels filled with a two-phase refrigerant, which enhances heat transfer efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 5

the condenser side and the evaporator side are separated from each other by a barrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS11147188B2Heat exchanger for cooling an electronic enclosure
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 PFANNENBERG GMBH
  • US11147188B2 patent drawing
  • US11147188B2 patent drawing
  • US11147188B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to reduce the dimensions and costs of a heat exchanger, while at the same time increasing its heat effectiveness, it is suggested to configure the heat exchanger such that a condenser side and an evaporator side of the heat exchanger are separated from each other by a barrier.