Barrier Valve Closure Using Tubing Pressure and Disintegrating Balls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing barrier valve technologies for deep wells in multi-zone stimulation applications require control lines or mechanical intervention, which are costly and pose safety risks, especially in ultra-deep well locations, and often result in premature operation or fluid loss issues during stimulation.

Innovation Solution

A barrier valve design that uses tubing pressure to operate the valve between open and closed positions without control lines, employing sleeves and balls that disintegrate or disappear, allowing for single-pressure actuation and subsequent reopening without tracking pressure cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control lines are used to operate the barrier valve, then the valve can be controlled from the surface, but the cost and risk of damage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve controlVSAvoidcontrol line integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes control lines from the system entirely and replaces them with a self-actuating mechanism that uses tubing pressure and disintegrating balls to operate the barrier valve automatically, eliminating the source of control line damage risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier valve is designed to actuate automatically using tubing pressure and disintegrating balls as the actuating mechanism, eliminating the need for external control lines and making the system self-sufficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If pressure cycles are used to operate the barrier valve, then the valve can be actuated, but the valve may operate prematurely before needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve actuationVSAvoidvalve operation timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The disintegrating balls are placed in position before stimulation, and the barrier valve remains held open by the first ball until the precise moment when the ball disintegrates, ensuring the valve operates exactly when needed without premature actuation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the ball from solid to disintegrated form, using this parameter change as the trigger mechanism to actuate the barrier valve at the precise moment when the ball disintegrates during stimulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If mechanical shifting tools are used to operate the barrier valve, then the valve can be actuated, but the tools restrict the maximum tripping ball size or require additional trips

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve actuationVSAvoidshifting tool requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes mechanical shifting tools from the system and replaces them with a hydraulic actuation mechanism using tubing pressure and disintegrating balls, eliminating the restrictions on ball size and additional trip requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical shifting tool system with a hydraulic actuation system that uses tubing pressure and disintegrating balls to operate the barrier valve, eliminating mechanical interference and simplifying the overall system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and cost-effective operation of the barrier valve without control lines, preventing fluid loss and ensuring well control during stimulation and production phases, while simplifying the process by eliminating the need for intervention.

Implementation Method 1

A barrier valve closes using pressure on a ball landed on a seat associated with a sleeve whose movement opens a port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

pressure on a ball landed on a seat associated with a sleeve whose movement opens a port to allow tubing pressure to move the ball to a closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

The balls disintegrate or disappear by virtue of exposure to well fluids and/or temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDisintegration: Decomposition (biological)

Data Source

PatentUS10100610B2Barrier valve closure method for multi-zone stimulation without intervention or surface control lines
Publication Date: 2018.10.16 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US10100610B2 patent drawing
  • US10100610B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A barrier valve is operable to close using pressure on a ball landed on a seat associated with a sleeve whose movement opens a port to allow tubing pressure to move the ball to a closed position. Another sleeve is located on the opposite side of the closure ball in the barrier valve. Actuation of the second sleeve opens another passage to allow tubing pressure above ball to rotate the valve member back to an open position with the production tubing in the production packer so that production can begin. The balls disintegrate or disappear by virtue of exposure to well fluids and/or temperatures.