Base Editor Editing Site Detection Kit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting off-target effects of base editors in gene editing are limited by low sensitivity and accuracy, particularly due to uneven sequencing coverage and interference from genomic background noise, leading to inconsistent and biased results.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of a single-strand break at the edited base site, followed by labeling and enrichment of the editing intermediate using nucleotides with specific labeling molecules, allows for high-sensitivity detection of editing sites and off-target effects across the genome.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If whole genome sequencing is used to detect off-target effects, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but sensitivity is reduced due to uneven sequencing coverage and genomic background noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome coverageVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection process into multiple steps: first generating single-strand breaks at edited bases using specific endonucleases, then performing targeted labeling and enrichment of break sites before sequencing. This segmentation allows focused detection at editing sites rather than attempting to detect all potential off-target sites across the entire genome, thereby improving sensitivity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and enriches DNA fragments containing single-strand breaks at editing sites using labeling molecules and affinity purification. By taking out and concentrating these specific fragments from the complex genomic background, the method achieves high detection sensitivity even with limited sequencing depth, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive coverage and detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Quantity of substance

If conventional sequencing methods are used, then cost and data volume are reduced, but accuracy is worsened due to interference from natural variations and sequencing errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesequencing data volumeVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary enrichment of DNA fragments at editing sites before sequencing by using endonucleases to generate single-strand breaks, followed by labeling and affinity purification. This preliminary action concentrates the target sequences of interest, allowing accurate detection with reduced sequencing data volume and minimizing the impact of natural variations and sequencing errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces labeling molecules as intermediaries that specifically bind to single-strand break sites. These labeled intermediaries enable selective enrichment and identification of editing sites, improving detection accuracy while reducing the need for extensive sequencing data to distinguish true editing events from background noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If base editing is performed without detection method, then editing efficiency is improved, but reliability is worsened due to inability to identify off-target effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting efficiencyVSAvoidoff-target detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the detection method provides information about off-target editing events, allowing researchers to evaluate and improve base editor specificity. The detection results feed back into the design and optimization of base editors, enabling continuous improvement of both editing efficiency and reliability by identifying and correcting off-target effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise identification of editing sites and off-target effects with improved sensitivity and accuracy, reducing the need for extensive sequencing data and minimizing interference from natural variations and sequencing errors.

Implementation Method 1

generating a single-strand break at the edited base site in the first nucleic acid strand

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

introducing a labeled nucleotide at or downstream of the single-strand break to produce a labeled product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleic acid polymerization:

Implementation Method 3

isolating or enriching the labeled product by using a binding molecule capable of specifically recognizing and binding the labeling molecule

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpecific binding:

Data Source

PatentUS20240271204A1Method and kit for detecting editing sites of base editor
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 PEKING UNIV
  • US20240271204A1 patent drawing
  • US20240271204A1 patent drawing
  • US20240271204A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method for detecting nucleic acid sites edited by a base editor, and a kit for implementing the method. Also provided is a method for detecting the editing efficiency or off-target effects of the base editor editing nucleic acids.