Additive Manufacturing Base Plate Geometry for Sintering Fidelity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing and metal injection molding processes face challenges in efficiently supporting complex geometries and ensuring uniform reduction during sintering, leading to potential deformation and material loss.

Innovation Solution

The use of a base plate with a defined geometry, including a drainage area and interface layers, which complements the object's mass and footprint, and can be printed with a common or different material, to provide structural support and facilitate uniform reduction during sintering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a base plate is used to support the object during additive manufacturing and sintering, then structural support and stability are improved, but the complexity of the manufacturing process increases due to the need for additional components and steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base plate is integrated with the object as a single printed assembly, combining the support structure and the object into one component that is manufactured together through additive manufacturing, eliminating the need for separate support structures and simplifying the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The base plate serves multiple functions: it provides structural support during printing, acts as a shrink raft that complements the object's footprint reduction during sintering, and can be designed with drainage areas for debinder solvent passage, consolidating multiple support functions into a single component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If the base plate geometry is optimized to complement object reduction during sintering, then manufacturing precision is improved by preserving object fidelity, but the device complexity increases due to the need for precise geometric matching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject fidelityVSAvoidbase plate geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base plate geometry is locally optimized in specific areas, particularly at the contact areas where it interfaces with the object, to match the local reduction characteristics during sintering, rather than requiring uniform complexity throughout the entire base plate structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The base plate geometry is pre-calculated and designed before manufacturing based on the object's dimensions and expected sintering reduction, allowing the shrink raft dimensions to be determined in advance to complement the object's footprint reduction and maintain manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If drainage areas with pores are incorporated into the base plate, then debinding efficiency is improved by enabling solvent passage, but the structural strength may be reduced due to the presence of pores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebinding efficiencyVSAvoidbase plate strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The base plate incorporates controlled porous structures with specific pore size distributions that provide adequate pathways for debinder solvent passage while maintaining sufficient structural strength to support the object during the debinding and sintering processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The drainage areas with pores are localized to specific regions of the base plate where solvent passage is most needed, rather than distributing pores throughout the entire structure, thereby maintaining strength in critical load-bearing areas while enabling efficient debinding in designated drainage zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures minimal deformation and material loss by maintaining the fidelity of the finished object, optimizing space, and allowing for precise control over the sintering process, thereby improving the accuracy and efficiency of the manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

During sintering, the part is brought to a temperature near the melting point of the powdered metal, which evaporates any remaining binder and forming the metal powder into a solid mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

the sintering causes substantial uniform reduction of at least one dimension of the object and the base plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Implementation Method 3

the part is brought to a temperature near the melting point of the powdered metal, which evaporates any remaining binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11554418B2Base plate in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 DESKTOP METAL INC
  • US11554418B2 patent drawing
  • US11554418B2 patent drawing
  • US11554418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Assemblies fabricated by additive manufacturing include an object and a base plate providing support to the object during the manufacturing process. The geometry of the base plate is defined to optimize space and material constraints. During sintering, the base plate is reduced in area in a manner complementing the reduction in the footprint of the object, preserving the fidelity of the finished object.