Base Station Coverage Expansion for Traffic Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cellular wireless networks face operational limitations due to bandwidth, frequency allocation, and base station placement issues, leading to delayed call setups and blocked calls as coverage areas often reach capacity or remain underutilized, necessitating effective load balancing between coverage areas.

Innovation Solution

The method involves a first base station expanding its coverage area on a specific carrier frequency and signaling neighboring base stations to direct user equipment (UEs) to prioritize operating on that frequency, facilitating handoffs and ensuring utilization of available traffic channel resources by adjusting antenna tilt and broadcasting prioritization lists to UEs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a coverage area is expanded to serve more UEs, then the capacity and coverage distance are improved, but the traffic channel resources become overwhelmed and call setup delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidcall setup efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of coverage area parameters including distance of coverage, antenna tilt, and azimuthal direction. Base stations can modify their radiation patterns in real-time based on traffic conditions, allowing the network to adapt coverage boundaries dynamically rather than maintaining fixed cell geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters of base station operation including carrier frequency selection, pilot power levels, and antenna configuration. By adjusting these parameters, the network can shift UEs between different coverage areas and frequency channels to balance traffic loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If base stations use fixed antenna tilt and frequency allocation, then device complexity is reduced, but load balancing between coverage areas cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase station configurationVSAvoidtraffic resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of coverage area parameters including distance of coverage, antenna tilt, and azimuthal direction. Base stations can modify their radiation patterns in real-time based on traffic conditions, allowing the network to adapt coverage boundaries dynamically rather than maintaining fixed cell geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where base stations monitor traffic channel utilization and UE distribution, then adjust their parameters accordingly. This closed-loop control enables automatic load balancing without manual intervention, with base stations responding to network conditions by modifying their coverage characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If coverage areas are adjusted to balance traffic loads, then resource utilization improves, but handoff procedures between coverage areas become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic channel utilizationVSAvoidhandoff management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares for handoffs by pre-configuring adjacent base stations with information about expanded coverage areas and adjusting their parameters in advance. This preliminary action ensures that target coverage areas are ready to receive UEs before handoff occurs, reducing handoff complexity and improving success rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If base stations operate on multiple carrier frequencies with fixed allocation, then frequency resource management is simplified, but UEs cannot be directed to prioritize specific frequencies for load balancing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency managementVSAvoidcarrier frequency utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes physical parameters of base station operation including carrier frequency selection, pilot power levels, and antenna configuration. By adjusting these parameters, the network can shift UEs between different coverage areas and frequency channels to balance traffic loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where base stations monitor traffic channel utilization and UE distribution, then adjust their parameters accordingly. This closed-loop control enables automatic load balancing without manual intervention, with base stations responding to network conditions by modifying their coverage characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9832652B1Methods and systems for managing coverage area changes using base station signaling
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US9832652B1 patent drawing
  • US9832652B1 patent drawing
  • US9832652B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method and system for managing coverage area changes using base station signaling. The method may involve a first base station increasing the distance of coverage of the first base station on a first carrier frequency such that the extended coverage extends to a coverage area of a second base station on the first carrier frequency. The second base station may also be providing the coverage area on a second carrier frequency. The method may also involve causing one or more UEs being served by the second base station on the second frequency to prioritize operating on the first carrier frequency of the second base station over operating on the second carrier frequency of the second base station.