Base Station Interference Detection via Signal Portion Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communication systems face interference due to in-system collisions and random interference from multiple transmissions, which hinder effective communication, particularly in emergency scenarios where multiple devices try to communicate simultaneously, and existing methods lack a systematic approach to differentiate and mitigate these interferences.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus in a base station that detects interference by analyzing the constructive and destructive interference of common and non-common signal portions in registration/call requests, allowing for adaptive mitigation techniques such as regulating registration requests or changing the control channel frequency based on the interference type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple devices simultaneously transmit registration/call requests, then the communication system can handle high traffic volume, but in-system collisions occur causing interference and communication failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic handling capacityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The base station performs preliminary detection of interference type by analyzing the common portion of signals before attempting to process registration requests. This preliminary action identifies whether interference is caused by in-system collisions or out-of-system sources, enabling the system to take preventive measures before communication failure occurs, thus maintaining both high traffic capacity and reliable communication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters based on detected interference type: for in-system collisions, it adjusts registration request handling parameters; for out-of-system interference, it changes control channel frequency. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to maintain productivity while ensuring reliability under different interference conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the base station implements comprehensive interference detection and adaptive mitigation, then communication reliability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidbase station complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interference detection process is segmented into distinct steps: detecting interference, determining its type through common portion analysis, and applying specific mitigation techniques. This segmentation allows the base station to implement comprehensive interference management through modular, manageable functions rather than a monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base station autonomously detects interference types and applies appropriate mitigation techniques without external intervention. The system self-regulates by analyzing signal common portions and automatically adjusting its operation, reducing the need for external control while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the base station rolls the control channel to mitigate random interference, then interference mitigation is achieved, but communication disruption occurs during the transition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference levelVSAvoidcommunication interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The base station applies preliminary anti-action by detecting interference types before implementing mitigation. By identifying whether interference is from in-system collisions or out-of-system sources, the system can apply targeted countermeasures immediately, preventing the need for control channel rolling and thus avoiding communication disruption while still mitigating the harmful interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively identifies and mitigates interference caused by simultaneous registration/call requests, improving communication system performance by reducing collisions and ensuring reliable communication in overloaded scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

a common portion of the multiple, simultaneous transmissions can be decoded, while a non-common portion of the multiple, simultaneous transmissions cannot be decoded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConstructive interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

a common portion of the multiple, simultaneous transmissions can be decoded, while a non-common portion of the multiple, simultaneous transmissions cannot be decoded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS9615290B1Method and apparatus for detecting a type of interference in a communication system
Publication Date: 2017.04.04 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US9615290B1 patent drawing
  • US9615290B1 patent drawing
  • US9615290B1 patent drawing

AI summary

a method and apparatus for detecting interference within a communication system is provided herein. During operation, a base station will determine whether the interference is caused by in-system excessive collisions (e.g. multiple simultaneous registration and/or call requests). An appropriate mitigation technique will be applied by the base station based on a type of interference detected.