Base Station Interference Cancellation via Request Signaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In mobile communication systems, unlicensed frequency bands shared by multiple operators and systems face interference issues due to the lack of effective mechanisms for managing interference from hidden terminals, which limits the availability and quality of radio communication.

Innovation Solution

A base station and radio terminal configuration that includes a controller to transmit request information to another base station to stop interference signals, using a predetermined signal to determine if the unlicensed band is available, thereby mitigating interference and ensuring clear channel determination before transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If unlicensed frequency bands are shared by multiple operators and communication systems, then frequency band utilization is improved, but interference between different operators and systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency band utilizationVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The base station transmits transmission request information to another base station based on interference detection feedback. The system continuously monitors interference levels and adjusts transmission behavior accordingly, creating a closed-loop control mechanism that adapts to changing interference conditions in the shared unlicensed band.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where base stations exchange transmission request information through a coordinated control process. This intermediary communication protocol allows operators to manage interference by negotiating transmission rights before actual transmission occurs, preventing direct conflict between multiple users of the shared spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If clear channel determination process (LBT) is performed before transmission, then interference is reduced, but transmission availability decreases due to additional processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidtransmission availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The base station performs preliminary actions by detecting interference signals and determining transmission conditions before actual data transmission. By pre-assessing the channel state and interference level, the system can make informed decisions about whether to proceed with transmission, reducing unnecessary LBT cycles and improving overall transmission availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing LBT only when necessary based on interference detection, rather than performing a full LBT cycle for every transmission opportunity. This selective approach reduces processing time and improves transmission availability while still maintaining interference protection where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If transmission request information is transmitted to another base station to stop interference, then interference management is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference managementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base station performs self-service by autonomously detecting interference signals and initiating the transmission request process without requiring external intervention. The system monitors its own transmission environment, identifies interference sources, and coordinates resolution through automated exchange of transmission request information with neighboring base stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the interference management function from the broader transmission control system, creating a dedicated mechanism for detecting and addressing interference. By separating this specific function into a distinct process with dedicated detection and coordination steps, the system manages complexity through modularization rather than attempting to handle all control functions monolithically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10588024B2Base station and radio terminal for stopping transmission of an interference signal by an interference source
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 KYOCERA CORP
  • US10588024B2 patent drawing
  • US10588024B2 patent drawing
  • US10588024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A base station (eNB 200-1) operated in a specific frequency band shared by a plurality of operators or a plurality of communication systems transmits, to another base station (eNB 200-2) operated in the specific frequency band, transmission request information requesting transmission of a predetermined signal for stopping transmission of an interference signal by an interference source (UE 100-2) causing interference to a radio terminal (UE 100-1) connected to the base station.