Radio Base Station Detection Module Layout for Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modularly designed radio base stations face increased complexity and cost due to unnecessary signaling between detection modules for interference mitigation and multi-user detection, limiting the effectiveness of interference cancellation in wireless communication systems.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves arranging detection modules into subsets where interference information from one subset is communicated to another to optimize interference cancellation, minimizing information exchange and allocating users based on service to optimize interference mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If detection modules exchange information about user connections for interference mitigation, then interference cancellation effectiveness is improved, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection modules are divided into subsets, where each subset processes a specific group of users. This segmentation allows interference mitigation to be performed locally within subsets without requiring all modules to exchange information with all other modules, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining interference cancellation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each detection module or subset is assigned specific functionality for handling particular user groups. The information exchange is localized to relevant subsets rather than being global, which reduces the overall signaling complexity while preserving the interference mitigation capability where it is most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If detection modules exchange information about user connections for interference mitigation, then interference cancellation effectiveness is improved, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation effectivenessVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting detection modules into subsets that handle specific user groups, the implementation cost is reduced because each module only needs to exchange information with a limited set of other modules rather than all modules in the system. This segmentation maintains interference cancellation effectiveness while lowering the overall implementation cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If users are allocated to different detection modules, then multi-user detection capability is improved, but information exchange requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-user detection capabilityVSAvoidinformation exchange requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Users are segmented into different groups assigned to specific detection module subsets. This segmentation enables multi-user detection capability while minimizing information exchange requirements, as each subset only needs to share information with other subsets that handle related user groups, rather than requiring complete information exchange across all modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8948699B2Method and arrangement for interference mitigation
Publication Date: 2015.02.03 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US8948699B2 patent drawing
  • US8948699B2 patent drawing
  • US8948699B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method of interference mitigation in a multi user detection capable radio base station in a communication system, which radio base station comprises a set confined detection modules, at least one of which is capable of handling multiple user connections, first and at least a second subset of detection modules are formed from said set, wherein the second set comprises at least one interference mitigation capable detection module. Interference information from the first subset is communicated to the second subset, interference originating in user connections of the first subset are then mitigated from the user connections of the second subset. Subsequently, interference is mutually mitigated between the connections within the interference mitigation capable detection module.