Base Station Outage Prioritization Using Predictive Recovery Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack a systematic approach for prioritizing site recovery during network outages, inefficiently utilize decision-making during outages without predictive tools, and fail to accurately estimate maintenance times, leading to prolonged downtime and suboptimal resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for selecting base stations for recovery during outages that incorporates predictive outage analysis, simulates total outage durations based on various recovery scenarios, and accurately estimates maintenance times considering factors like travel time, equipment type, and technician skill levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If technicians respond to outages based on current outage notifications alone, then response speed to immediate failures is improved, but overall network downtime increases due to suboptimal prioritization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidoverall network downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating predicted outage durations and preparing recovery sequences in advance. The network management component predicts when sites will be restored and pre-determines optimal technician routing, allowing technicians to arrive at the optimal moment rather than reacting blindly to immediate outage notifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where actual outage durations are continuously monitored and fed back into the prediction models. This feedback mechanism allows the system to refine its predictions over time, improving the accuracy of outage duration estimation and enabling better prioritization decisions that balance response speed with overall downtime minimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If technicians prioritize sites based solely on distance or current outage status, then immediate repair speed is improved, but resource allocation becomes inefficient when considering predicted outages and planned activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair speedVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts prioritization criteria based on real-time conditions, predicted outages, and planned network activities. Rather than using static rules like 'nearest site first', the system continuously recalculates optimal routes and priorities considering multiple factors including predicted restoration times, technician locations, and upcoming network events, making resource allocation adaptable to changing circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for site prioritization from simple distance-based metrics to a multi-parameter evaluation including predicted outage duration, site weight, technician location, and planned activities. This parameter transformation enables the system to optimize resource allocation by weighing different factors appropriately based on current network conditions and predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the system lacks predictive outage analysis, then system complexity is reduced, but decision-making efficiency deteriorates due to inability to consider future outage scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddecision-making efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary predictive analysis to forecast future outage scenarios and prepare recovery strategies in advance. By predicting when sites will be affected and calculating optimal response sequences beforehand, the system enhances decision-making efficiency without requiring complex real-time calculations during actual outages, thus managing complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network management component proactively identifies sites at risk of upcoming outages based on planned activities and predicted failures. By preparing technician routes and prioritization lists in advance, the system improves decision-making efficiency while keeping the overall system architecture manageable through pre-computed recovery sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If accurate maintenance time estimation is not provided, then communication simplicity is maintained, but subscriber experience deteriorates due to inability to plan around outages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication simplicityVSAvoidoutage duration information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of estimated repair durations and communicates these predictions to subscribers before outages occur or immediately when detected. By providing advance information about expected downtime, the system enhances subscriber experience and enables better planning while maintaining clear and straightforward communication through standardized duration estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250343725A1System and method for managing outages in a network
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 YAMINE BADAWI
  • US20250343725A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343725A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343725A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a system (100) for managing outages in a network, the system (100) includes a network management component (104) operatively coupled to one or more base stations (102) and a computing device (108). The network management component (104) having an OSS unit (106) configured to generate and transmit an alarm during outage to the computing device (108), and perform calculations to analyze a set of attributes pertaining to total duration of outage of each base station (102), weight of each base station (102), expected duration to repair each base station (102), predictions and planned outages of the one or more base stations (102) and any combination thereof and integrate decision-making process for dispatching one or more technicians, potential drone deployment, and outage period communication to associated mobile devices, while prioritizing recovery of the one or more base stations based on calculated set of attributes.