Base Station UE Selection for Federated Learning Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The deployment of federated learning (FL) in wireless networks faces challenges due to system heterogeneity, statistical heterogeneity, and trustworthiness, which affect the optimization of FL in these networks.

Innovation Solution

A base station (BS) is configured to determine a number N of UEs and a first channel gain threshold based on uplink channel state information, and then selects UEs with the smallest scheduling indicator values for local model training. This process involves transmitting scheduling indicator report configurations, receiving scheduling indicators, and updating global models accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all UEs are selected for local model training, then the diversity of local data improves the global model quality, but the communication overhead and convergence time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal model qualityVSAvoidconvergence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the UE selection process into multiple stages: initial scheduling indicator calculation, threshold-based filtering, and iterative refinement. By dividing the large set of all UEs into smaller subsets through sequential filtering steps, the system maintains model quality while reducing the number of UEs participating in each training round, thus decreasing communication overhead and convergence time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the channel gain threshold parameter based on system conditions, historical performance, and convergence requirements. By changing this threshold parameter adaptively, the system optimizes the balance between selecting enough diverse UEs for model quality and limiting the number to reduce communication overhead, directly addressing the contradiction between reliability and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If UEs with poor channel conditions are included, then the number of participating UEs increases improving data diversity, but the communication efficiency and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata diversityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by evaluating each UE's individual channel condition and assigning different selection probabilities or thresholds based on their specific characteristics. Instead of uniform treatment, UEs with better channel conditions receive higher priority, while those with poor conditions are selectively included only when they provide unique data value, thus maintaining data diversity without compromising communication reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by selecting only a subset of UEs that meet the channel threshold criteria for each training round. Rather than including all potentially diverse UEs, the system applies a filtering mechanism that includes just enough UEs with adequate channel conditions to achieve sufficient data diversity, thereby maintaining communication reliability while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the scheduling indicator calculation is complex, then the selection accuracy improves, but the computational overhead at the BS increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of scheduling indicators during idle periods or based on pre-measured channel state information before the actual UE selection decision is required. By pre-computing these indicators and storing them, the system reduces the real-time computational burden at the base station while maintaining accurate selection based on pre-analyzed data, thus balancing precision with power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables UEs to self-report their scheduling indicators or pre-process their own selection criteria based on local measurements. This shifts part of the computational burden from the base station to the UEs themselves, allowing the BS to make selection decisions with less computational overhead while maintaining accuracy through the UEs' own assessments of their channel conditions and capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250031230A1Methods and apparatuses for user equipment selecting and scheduling in intelligent wireless system
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD
  • US20250031230A1 patent drawing
  • US20250031230A1 patent drawing
  • US20250031230A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and apparatuses for user equipment (UE) selecting and scheduling in an intelligent wireless system. An embodiment of the subject application provides a base station (BS). The BS includes a processor and a wireless transceiver coupled to the processor. The processor is configured to: obtain a number N and a first channel gain threshold, wherein the number N and the first channel gain threshold are determined based at least in part on uplink channel state information between the BS and multiple UEs; transmit, with the wireless transceiver, a scheduling indicator report configuration to each of the multiple UEs; receive, with the wireless transceiver, multiple scheduling indicators; and select the number N of UEs for participating in local model training according to the multiple scheduling indicators.