In-situ Basement Wall Framing with Closed-Cell Foam

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional basement finishing methods using wood framing and batt insulation fail due to moisture absorption, leading to structural issues and health hazards from mold growth, as these materials are prone to rot and absorb moisture.

Innovation Solution

An in-situ fabricated wall system using non-organic plastic materials and closed-cell foam panels that can be installed independently within a basement, featuring a horizontally-extending floor member, vertically-extending support beams, and foam panels that are mechanically adhered to the floor and ceiling, providing a moisture-resistant and mold-free structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional wood framing and batt insulation are used in basement walls, then the structure can be easily constructed, but the materials absorb moisture leading to rot and mold growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of constructionVSAvoidmoisture resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters from traditional organic wood and batt insulation to non-organic closed-cell foam panels. This material substitution fundamentally alters the moisture absorption characteristics while maintaining construction feasibility, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and moisture resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite wall system integrating multiple non-organic materials: closed-cell foam panels for insulation, non-organic sheathing boards for structural support, and fluid-applied waterproofing membranes. This composite approach ensures all components collectively resist moisture while maintaining ease of assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If porous materials like wood and batt insulation are used, then construction is simple and inexpensive, but structural failure occurs due to moisture absorption and rot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction simplicityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the material composition from porous organic materials to non-porous non-organic closed-cell foam and sheathing boards. This parameter change eliminates moisture absorption pathways while preserving construction simplicity through modular panel assembly and standard fastening methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional materials are used for basement walls, then initial construction cost is low, but health hazards arise from mold spores and unsafe living conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction costVSAvoidmold growth and health hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition to non-organic closed-cell foam panels and non-organic sheathing boards that inherently resist mold growth. This material substitution eliminates the biological substrate required for mold while maintaining cost-effectiveness through efficient installation and reduced long-term remediation needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the inherently moisture-resistant properties of closed-cell foam into a protective barrier that actively prevents mold growth. The material's closed-cell structure, which naturally repels moisture, becomes a beneficial feature that eliminates health hazards rather than merely preventing structural failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Adaptability or versatility

If free-standing in-situ fabricated walls are used, then placement flexibility is improved, but additional structural support requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement flexibilityVSAvoidstructural support requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates attachment means directly into the wall assembly during preliminary construction. The non-organic sheathing boards are pre-configured with attachment mechanisms that provide both structural support and anchoring capability, eliminating the need for separate support structures while enabling flexible placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution creates a rigid, moisture-resistant, and mold-free basement wall system that prevents structural failure and health hazards, offering flexibility in placement and reducing electromagnetic interference while providing adequate thermal insulation and mechanical integrity for attaching heavy objects.

Implementation Method 1

A foam panel is disposed in the upwardly facing channel of the floor member and in one of the laterally-adjacent channels of the first support beam and in one of the laterally-adjacent channels of the second support beam. The foam panel comprises a closed-cell non-organic foam material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentUS9422713B2In-situ fabricated wall framing and insulating system
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 TREBIL JESSE B
  • US9422713B2 patent drawing
  • US9422713B2 patent drawing
  • US9422713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wall system for basements includes a horizontally-extending floor member defining an upwardly facing channel. A first vertically-extending support beam is coupled to the floor member and defines a pair of laterally-adjacent channels separated by a center rib. A second similar support beam is laterally displaced along the floor member with respect to the first support beam. A foam panel is disposed in the upwardly facing channel of the floor member and in one of the laterally-adjacent channels of the first support beam and in one of the laterally-adjacent channels of the second support beam. The floor member, first support beam and second support beam comprise a non-organic plastic material. The foam panel comprises a closed-cell non-organic foam material. The wall system can be formed in-situ and can be configured as a free-standing wall.