Batch Melting Furnace Control for Variable Scrap Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Secondary metals recycling processes face inefficiencies due to the variability in metal scrap shape, size, and composition, leading to unpredictable energy needs and operational challenges in melting furnaces, with existing control methods failing to optimize melt times and energy usage in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A system employing sensors and data inputs to monitor metal charge and furnace parameters, predicting process pour readiness time and optimizing operating conditions for improved efficiency, including energy and time requirements, by calculating theoretical and actual fuel consumption and adjusting furnace operations accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional melting processes are used with variable scrap input, then the furnace can accommodate different scrap shapes and sizes, but the energy needs and operational efficiency vary significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of varied scrap inputVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts burner firing rates based on real-time charge characteristics and melt progress. The control system modifies heating parameters continuously rather than using fixed settings, allowing the furnace to adapt to varying scrap compositions while maintaining consistent productivity and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes operational parameters (firing rate, heat input level) based on the stage of melting and charge properties. By monitoring temperature, melt fraction, and charge characteristics, the system adjusts heating parameters to optimize energy usage for each specific melting scenario, resolving the contradiction between handling varied scrap and maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If high heat input is applied to melt solid charge quickly, then melting time is reduced, but the charge may be overheated beyond what is needed for metal transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelting speedVSAvoidcharge temperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from temperature sensors and melt progress detection to continuously monitor the charging state. This feedback loop allows the control system to adjust heat input in real-time, increasing heating when the charge is solid and reducing it when molten metal is formed, thereby achieving fast melting without overheating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The heating process is applied periodically or in stages rather than continuously at constant intensity. The system applies high heat input during the solid charge phase, then reduces or interrupts heating when melting is complete, preventing overheating while maintaining rapid melting during the critical phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If multiple furnaces are operated simultaneously by operators, then production capacity increases, but process variability penalties are amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidprocess consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system operates autonomously to monitor and adjust each furnace's melting process without requiring constant operator intervention. By self-regulating based on sensor data, each furnace maintains consistent performance independently, allowing multiple furnaces to operate simultaneously without amplifying variability penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces manual operator control with an automated control system that uses sensors and processors to manage furnace operations. This substitution eliminates human variability in judgment and reaction time, ensuring consistent process control across multiple simultaneously operated furnaces while maintaining high production capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables a 15% reduction in energy efficiency, prevents overheating, shortens cycle times, and enhances production by accurately predicting and managing energy input and melt times, thereby improving overall operational efficiency and productivity.

Implementation Method 1

a burner configured and arranged to provide heat of combustion to the charge in the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

at least one sensor to detect at least one process parameter characterizing progress of a melting process in the furnace

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation detection: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS11441206B2System and method of operating a batch melting furnace
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US11441206B2 patent drawing
  • US11441206B2 patent drawing
  • US11441206B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of controlling a metal melting process in a melting furnace, including determining at least one furnace parameter characterizing a melting furnace, adding a charge containing solid metal into the melting furnace, detecting at least one charge parameter characterizing the charge, firing a burner into the melting furnace to provide heat to melt the charge, and exhausting burner combustion products from the furnace, detecting at least one process parameter characterizing progress of melting the charge, calculating a furnace efficiency based on the at least one furnace parameter, calculating a predicted process pour readiness time based on the at least one charge parameter, the at least one process parameter, and the furnace efficiency, and controlling the metal melting process based on the predicted process pour readiness time.