Batch Plant Regressor Architecture for Sparse-Data Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for simulating and controlling batch processes in chemical or biological reactors require significant computational resources and are inflexible due to the need for extensive data retraining when conditions change, and existing hybrid models are not efficient in handling sparse data sets.

Innovation Solution

A nested artificial neural network (ANN) system is employed, separating the modeling of educt quality parameters by a first ANN and process parameters by a second ANN, allowing for efficient training and reuse of data across similar batch processes, even with sparse data availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If whitebox models based on first principles are used to simulate batch processes, then modeling accuracy is improved, but computational resources and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the batch process into multiple phases (e.g., filling phase, reaction phase, discharge phase) and trains separate neural network models for each phase. This segmentation allows the system to achieve accurate modeling comparable to whitebox models while reducing computational complexity by focusing each model on specific phase characteristics rather than modeling the entire complex process at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If conventional blackbox models are used to predict product quality, then computational resources are reduced, but flexibility and adaptability worsen when conditions change requiring retraining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resourcesVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability by enabling the neural network model to be selectively retrained for specific phases when phase characteristics change, rather than requiring complete model retraining. The system can adapt to changing educt characteristics, process parameters, or product quality targets by updating only the affected phase models, maintaining flexibility while reducing computational overhead compared to conventional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If hybrid models combining whitebox and blackbox approaches are used, then modeling accuracy is improved, but device complexity and data requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs lightweight neural network models for each phase that can be independently trained and discarded/retrained as needed, replacing the need for complex hybrid models. These simpler phase-specific models achieve sufficient accuracy for their respective phases without requiring the integration of multiple model types, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining adequate modeling precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Measurement precision

If complete datasets are used for training conventional models, then model accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases due to extensive training requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training neural network models for each phase using available historical data, and then enabling rapid adaptation to new conditions by retraining only the affected phase models. This approach allows the system to maintain high prediction accuracy while significantly reducing the time required for model updates compared to complete retraining of conventional blackbox or hybrid models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4352575B1Monitoring and/or controlling a plant via a machine-learning regressor
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 BASF SE
  • EP4352575B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4352575B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4352575B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Aspects of a computer-implemented regressor (7) for simulating, monitoring and/or control-ling a batch plant (1) are disclosed. The batch plant (1) is implemented to receive one or more educts (3, 5) having associated educt quality parameters (x1, x2), to process said educt(s) (3, 5) wherein the process has associated process parameters (yj), and to output a product (4, 5) having associated product quality parameters (Q1, Q2). The regressor (7) comprises at least two regressor units (9, 10) based on machine-learning principles, each regressor unit (9, 10) having an input for receiving input data, and an output for outputting output data. A first regressor unit (9) is implemented to receive said educt quality parame-ters (xi) and to output at least one educt impact parameter (R1). And a second regressor unit (10) is implemented to receive said educt impact parameter (R1) and said process pa-rameters (yj) and to output at least one product quality parameter (Qj).