Bathing Gel Surfactant Reduction Aquatic Toxicity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Commercial personal cleansing products, particularly those containing anionic surfactants and fragrance oils, contribute significantly to aquatic toxicity and water pollution due to their persistence and harmful effects on aquatic organisms, despite their importance for human hygiene.

Innovation Solution

A bathing gel composition comprising no more than 11.5% anionic surfactant, up to 3% zwitterionic surfactant, at least 0.1% long-chain alkyl hydroxyalkyl cellulose, and optional non-ionic surfactant or fragrance oil, which reduces surfactant and fragrance oil concentrations while maintaining cleansing performance and environmental sustainability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If anionic surfactants and fragrance oils are used in personal cleansing products, then cleansing performance and foam generation are improved, but aquatic toxicity and environmental persistence increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleansing performanceVSAvoidaquatic toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by limiting anionic surfactants to ≤11.5% and introducing long-chain alkyl hydroxyalkyl cellulose derivatives (≥0.1%) as alternative surfactants. This parameter change maintains cleansing performance while reducing aquatic toxicity and improving biodegradability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite surfactant system combining multiple types (anionic, zwitterionic, non-ionic, and cellulose derivatives) rather than relying on a single surfactant type. This composite approach achieves effective cleansing while reducing dependence on highly toxic anionic surfactants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If high concentrations of anionic surfactants are used, then foam generation and cleansing effectiveness are enhanced, but biodegradability decreases and environmental persistence increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleansing effectivenessVSAvoidbiodegradability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surfactant composition parameters by limiting anionic surfactants to ≤11.5% and introducing biodegradable alternatives including long-chain alkyl hydroxyalkyl cellulose derivatives (≥0.1%), zwitterionic surfactants (≤3%), and non-ionic surfactants (≤2%). This parameter change maintains cleansing effectiveness while improving biodegradability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prioritizes surfactants with short environmental half-lives and high biodegradability (cellulose derivatives, zwitterionic surfactants) over persistent anionic surfactants. These alternative surfactants break down quickly in the environment, reducing persistence while maintaining cleansing function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If fragrance oils are used in personal cleansing products, then user perception of benefit and product appeal are improved, but aquatic toxicity and biodegradability issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser perception of benefitVSAvoidtoxic effect on aquatic organisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fragrance concentration parameter by limiting fragrance oils to ≤3% in the composition. This reduction maintains acceptable user perception of benefit while significantly reducing the toxic load on aquatic ecosystems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent reduces fragrance oil concentration to minimize environmental harm while the presence of cellulose derivatives and other surfactants compensates by maintaining overall product performance and user satisfaction. The harm reduction does not sacrifice the benefit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS8637439B2Bathing gel with improved environmental profile
Publication Date: 2014.01.28 COTY INC
  • US8637439B2 patent drawing
  • US8637439B2 patent drawing
  • US8637439B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compositions adapted for use as a bathing (shower or bath) gel for personal cleansing are provided, the compositions containing reduced loadings of relatively harsh anionic surfactants and of fragrance oils, but retaining a spectrum of functional properties perceived by consumers as desirable. The compositions include lower concentrations of anionic surfactants compared to standard bathing gel compositions, but the addition of quantities of a long-chain alkyl, hydroxyalkyl cellulose derivative to the composition preserves or enhances functional properties such as viscosity, skin mildness, foam generation on lathering, subjective perceived cleansing appreciation, and fragrance performance. The bathing gels provide an environmental benefit such as reduced surfactant loading, biodegradability, and aquatic toxicity of wastewater streams when used in the place of standard bathing gels.