Bathymetry Feature Segmentation for Accurate Underwater Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing geospatial data processing techniques, particularly for underwater topography, face challenges in accurately identifying and mapping features of interest due to insufficient or biased training datasets, leading to faulty or insufficient automated mapping using machine learning systems.

Innovation Solution

A segmentation machine learning network is employed to generate segmentation masks for bathymetry data, utilizing convolutional neural networks and deep learning architectures to improve feature detection in bathymetry waveforms, enabling high-resolution mapping and classification of underwater features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine learning systems are used for automated mapping of bathymetry data, then processing efficiency is improved, but accuracy deteriorates due to insufficient or biased training datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidfeature detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing manual annotation and expert review before final automated mapping. Trained operators manually label features of interest in bathymetry data, creating high-quality training datasets that improve subsequent machine learning accuracy. This preliminary manual processing ensures accurate feature identification before automation takes over.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where machine learning system outputs are reviewed and corrected by human operators. The system continuously learns from these corrections, with annotated results fed back into the training process to improve future predictions. This closed-loop feedback resolves the accuracy issue while maintaining automated processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual feature identification is used, then accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the processing workflow into distinct phases: initial automated processing for broad coverage, followed by targeted manual review of specific regions or uncertain detections. This segmented approach allows most data to be processed quickly by machines while human expertise is applied only where needed, balancing speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by applying manual review selectively rather than to all data. Human operators focus their effort on specific portions of the dataset where machine learning confidence is low or where features are particularly critical, rather than manually processing everything. This partial manual intervention maintains accuracy for critical features while preserving overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If automated mapping is implemented, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to insufficient training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping throughputVSAvoidmapping reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures reliable training data through preliminary manual annotation efforts before deploying automated mapping. Expert operators create comprehensive labeled datasets that cover various seabed conditions and feature types, establishing a solid foundation for reliable machine learning operation at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent builds reliability through continuous feedback loops where automated mapping results are validated and corrected by human experts. These corrections are fed back into the training system, progressively improving model reliability while maintaining high productivity. The system becomes increasingly trustworthy through iterative learning from real-world results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260017798A1System and method of feature detection for airborne bathymetry
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 FNV IP BV
  • US20260017798A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017798A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017798A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to systems and techniques for processing frames of data. For example, a method can include obtaining a plurality of geospatial data inputs, each geospatial data input of the plurality of geospatial data inputs associated with a sample time and a surveyed area; generating a plurality of features corresponding to each geospatial data input of the plurality of geospatial data inputs; and generating, using a segmentation machine learning network, one or more segmentation masks for the plurality of geospatial data inputs.