Batten Joint for Internal Floating Roof Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional internal floating roof arrangements for fluid tanks face issues with inadequate sealing at panel joints, difficulty in controlling periphery fires, and lack of attachment measures for appurtenances, leading to safety hazards and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a batten joint and butt joint system with adjustable retainers, fasteners, and gaskets for improved sealing, along with a panel aperture bracket for secure attachment of appurtenances, addresses the sealing and attachment issues, and incorporates a foam dam for fire control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If full contact floating roof is used to eliminate vapor space, then safety hazard from vapor space is reduced, but panel joint sealing becomes inadequate allowing vapor seepage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor space safety hazardVSAvoidpanel joint sealing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The floating roof is divided into multiple panels that can be separately manufactured and assembled. Each panel is connected through modular joint assemblies, allowing the system to achieve both full contact sealing and structural integrity. The segmentation enables precise sealing at joints while maintaining the overall vapor space elimination goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A sealing intermediary component is introduced at the panel joints to bridge the gap between adjacent panels. This intermediary sealing element ensures vapor-tight connections while allowing for manufacturing tolerances and thermal expansion, thus maintaining reliable sealing without compromising the full contact design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If conventional panel joining method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but sealing efficiency becomes inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel joining structureVSAvoidsealing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sealing functions are merged into a single integrated joint assembly that combines mechanical connection, sealing, and adjustment capabilities. This merged design achieves high sealing efficiency without proportionally increasing overall device complexity, as the joint assembly serves multiple purposes simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The panel joint assembly is designed as a universal component that performs multiple functions: mechanical fastening, vapor sealing, thermal expansion accommodation, and manufacturing tolerance compensation. This multi-functionality maintains relatively simple device architecture while achieving superior sealing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If fixed panel retainer spacing is used, then manufacturing precision requirement is reduced, but manufacturing tolerances cause roof distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel retainer spacing precisionVSAvoidfloating roof geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The panel retainer spacing is made adjustable rather than fixed, allowing the spacing to be dynamically modified during assembly to compensate for manufacturing tolerances. This dynamic adjustment capability maintains the floating roof's geometric stability without requiring extremely precise manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spacing parameter of the panel retainers is made variable through adjustable mounting mechanisms. By allowing the spacing parameter to be changed during assembly, the system can accommodate manufacturing tolerances and prevent roof distortion while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9267521B2Batten joint for an internal floating roof of a fluid tank
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 MATRIX APPLIED TECH PTY LTD
  • US9267521B2 patent drawing
  • US9267521B2 patent drawing
  • US9267521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A batten joint for an internal floating roof of a fluid tank. The floating roof has at least a first panel having a first panel edge and a second panel having a second panel edge. The batten joint comprises a first panel retainer or retaining means adapted for retaining the first panel edge, a second panel retainer or retaining means adapted for retaining the second panel edge, and at least one batten engaging the first and second panel retainer or retaining means in a spaced apart configuration.