Battery Authentication Phase-Out for Backward Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low-quality, counterfeit battery packs pose safety and performance risks to battery-powered devices due to inadequate authentication methods, which can be hacked by manufacturers, and existing robust authentication solutions are not backward compatible, causing user inconvenience.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that authenticates removable battery packs by sending an inquiry message to the battery pack, determining the validity of the reply, and enabling or disabling device operation based on a phase-out period and recharge cycle threshold, allowing continued use of older packs within their useful life while ensuring robust authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If robust authentication solution is implemented, then battery safety and authentication reliability are improved, but backward compatibility deteriorates causing user inconvenience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidbackward compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the battery type detected. During a phase-out period, the system accepts both new authenticated batteries and old unauthenticated batteries. After the phase-out period expires, the system transitions to only accepting new authenticated batteries, thereby providing backward compatibility during the transition while ensuring security after

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary authentication checks before enabling device operation. It sends inquiry messages to the battery pack and validates replies from authentication components. The system also preliminarily determines whether the battery is subject to phase-out restrictions before allowing operation, preventing unauthorized batteries from being used while maintaining compatibility with legitimate older batteries during the transition period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If simple authentication techniques are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but authentication reliability deteriorates allowing counterfeit batteries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication implementation easeVSAvoidauthentication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into distinct functional components: an inquiry message sending module, a reply validation module that checks authentication components, and a phase-out period management module. This segmentation allows the complex authentication process to be implemented through modular, manageable steps while maintaining high reliability through multiple validation points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by sending inquiry messages to the battery pack and evaluating the replies. The processor determines whether the reply from the authentication component is valid, and based on this feedback, decides whether to enable or disable device operation. This feedback loop ensures reliable authentication while maintaining ease of implementation through clear decision logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If phase-out period is implemented, then counterfeit battery prevention is improved, but user convenience deteriorates requiring battery replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeit preventionVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturer sets a phase-out period in advance before the robust authentication solution is fully enforced. This preliminary action gives users adequate notice and time to replace their older batteries with new authenticated ones, reducing inconvenience while maintaining security. The system preliminarily determines during the phase-out period whether to allow operation based on authentication status

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes its authentication requirements over time. During the phase-out period, it maintains flexibility by allowing both authenticated and unauthenticated batteries to operate. After the phase-out period expires, it transitions to a stricter mode where only authenticated batteries are accepted, thereby balancing user convenience during transition with security after the transition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10505378B2Ensuring backward compatibility in battery authentication applications
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10505378B2 patent drawing
  • US10505378B2 patent drawing
  • US10505378B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method to identify whether a removable battery pack inserted into a battery-powered device is an authorized battery pack for the device. Battery-powered devices may include a battery-powered drill, saw, flashlight or other type of device. The battery-powered device may send an authentication query to the battery pack. If the battery-powered device does not receive a valid reply from the battery pack, the battery-powered device may verify that the battery-powered device is still within a phase-out period that allows the battery-powered device to use a battery pack with an invalid authentication. If the phase-out period has expired, the battery-powered device may disable the use of the battery pack with an invalid authentication. If the phase-out period is still running, the battery-powered device may allow the use of the battery pack with an invalid authentication, but only for a limited number of battery pack recharge cycles.