Battery Energy Storage Control Using Grid Carbon Intensity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy storage systems primarily optimize energy usage based on financial metrics, neglecting the carbon intensity of the energy sources, which can lead to increased carbon footprint and non-optimal environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a battery management system that utilizes a carbon intensity metric alongside financial metrics to optimize energy storage and discharge decisions, using an algorithm that considers the State of Carbon and carbon intensity of the grid to minimize carbon footprint while reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If energy storage systems optimize energy usage based on financial metrics only, then energy cost reduction is achieved, but carbon intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy costVSAvoidcarbon intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the optimization parameters from purely financial metrics to a dual-parameter system that includes both financial metrics and carbon intensity metrics. The battery management system dynamically adjusts charging/discharging decisions based on real-time evaluation of both cost and carbon intensity parameters, transforming the single-objective optimization into a multi-objective optimization problem that simultaneously considers economic and environmental factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If battery management considers only financial metrics, then operational cost is minimized, but environmental impact worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The battery management system is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it optimizes for both financial returns and environmental performance. The system universally evaluates multiple objectives (cost minimization and carbon intensity reduction) and integrates them into a unified decision-making framework, allowing the same control system to achieve both economic and environmental benefits without requiring separate management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If real-time carbon intensity monitoring is implemented, then carbon footprint is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon footprintVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback loops that continuously monitor carbon intensity signals from the grid and adjust battery charging/discharging operations accordingly. The battery management system receives real-time carbon intensity data, processes this information through its optimization algorithm, and dynamically adjusts operational parameters to minimize carbon footprint while maintaining financial efficiency, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250343414A1Energy Storage System Responsive to Carbon Generation Parameters
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 CADENZA INNOVATION INC
  • US20250343414A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343414A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343414A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems for and methods of using carbon generation parameters with battery energy storage to achieve a desired optimization in the energy storage operation of a battery. At least one parameter in achieving the desired optimization for managing energy storage includes the carbon generation parameter of the energy being used in the battery operations.