Battery Cell Position-Limiting Structure for Swelling Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery manufacturing processes are complex, costly, and heavy due to the need for multiple components to manage expansive forces and structural reinforcement, which complicates the assembly and increases weight and production costs.

Innovation Solution

A battery design featuring a box body with a position-limiting member that abuts against the first side wall of battery cells to limit deformation, eliminating the need for end plates and connecting members, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process, reducing weight, and enhancing structural strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If end plates and connecting members are arranged to fasten battery cells and resist expansive force, then structural strength is improved, but device complexity increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the position-limiting function and the expansive force resistance function into a single position-limiting member. This member simultaneously limits the position of battery cells and resists expansive forces during charging, eliminating the need for separate end plates and connecting members. The merging of functions reduces device complexity while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The position-limiting member is designed to perform multiple functions: it limits the position of battery cells, resists expansive forces during charging, and provides structural support. This multi-functional design replaces the traditional separate components (end plates, connecting members, reinforcement structures), thereby reducing the number of parts and simplifying the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If end plates and connecting members are arranged to fasten battery cells, then structural strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple structural components into a single position-limiting member, eliminating redundant parts such as end plates, connecting members, and separate reinforcement structures. This integration reduces the total weight of the battery assembly while maintaining the necessary structural strength through the optimized design of the position-limiting member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If end plates and connecting members are arranged to fasten battery cells, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into a single position-limiting member, reducing the number of parts that need to be manufactured, stored, and assembled. This simplification of the component list directly reduces manufacturing costs while the optimized design of the position-limiting member ensures that structural strength requirements are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary components from the traditional battery structure, such as end plates and connecting members that are not essential when the position-limiting member is properly designed. This removal of redundant parts simplifies the manufacturing process and reduces production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Force

If multiple components are arranged to manage expansive force, then resistance to expansive force is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to expansive forceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The position-limiting member is designed to simultaneously limit cell position and resist expansive forces during charging. By making this single component multi-functional, the patent eliminates the need for separate reinforcement structures and connecting members that would otherwise be required to handle expansive forces, thereby reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250023179A1Battery and electrical apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED
  • US20250023179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250023179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250023179A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery includes a box body, a battery group, and a position-limiting member. The battery group is arranged in the box body. The battery group includes two or more battery cells arranged in a first direction. The battery cell includes a first side wall and a second side wall connected together. The first side wall is a wall having the largest area among all outer walls of the battery cell. The second side walls of two adjacent battery cells are arranged opposite to each other in the first direction. The position-limiting member is fixedly connected to the box body and abuts against the first side wall of the battery cell. The position-limiting member is used for limiting deformation of the battery cell in a second direction, and the second direction is perpendicular to the first side wall.