Battery Charger Constant Current Control Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery chargers with constant current-constant voltage (CC-CV) control loops face issues such as increased charge time, sensitivity in transitioning from CC to CV, and risk of overcharging due to independent CC and CV control circuits, especially in smaller batteries with higher equivalent series resistance (ESR).

Innovation Solution

A battery charger architecture utilizing a constant current control loop with a Digital Voltage Limiter (DVL) and Accelerated Settle Down (ASD) technique, eliminating the need for a constant voltage loop and amplifier, and incorporating digital controls to dynamically manage charging current, thereby reducing charging time and circuit complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional CC-CV control loop is used with independent CC and CV control circuits, then charging current can be regulated during CC and CV phases, but transition from CC to CV causes discontinuity and overcurrent risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging safetyVSAvoidcontrol circuit architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the independent CC and CV control circuits into a unified control architecture where a single control circuit manages both charging phases. This eliminates the discontinuity and overcurrent risk associated with transitioning between separate CC and CV control circuits, while maintaining the ability to regulate charging current throughout the entire charging process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit is designed to perform multiple functions: it operates in CC mode during the constant current phase and automatically transitions to CV mode during the constant voltage phase, all within a single unified control architecture. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate control circuits while ensuring safe and continuous charging regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If smaller battery pack is charged with conventional CC-CV charger, then charging should be faster, but charge time increases unexpectedly due to larger ESR

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidcharge time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control parameters that adapt to the battery's equivalent series resistance (ESR). By continuously monitoring charging conditions and adjusting control parameters in real-time, the system optimizes charging current delivery despite variations in battery ESR, ensuring that smaller batteries with higher ESR can be charged at expected speeds without unexpected delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If conventional CC-CV charger is used, then charging current can be regulated, but circuit area is larger due to separate CC and CV control circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging regulationVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines separate CC and CV control circuits into a single integrated control circuit that handles both charging phases. This merger maintains the regulatory control needed for safe charging while significantly reducing the overall circuit area by eliminating redundant components and control logic found in separate CC and CV circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If transition from CC to CV is made sensitive, then overcharging can be prevented, but charging time increases due to PRE-CV relaxation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovercharge preventionVSAvoidcharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic transition control that adapts to battery conditions during the CC to CV phase transition. The control circuit dynamically adjusts transition parameters based on real-time battery state, preventing overcharging while minimizing unnecessary charging time extensions that would occur with overly sensitive or fixed transition thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11616384B2Battery charger with constant current control loop
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 DIALOG SEMICONDUCTOR (UK) LTD
  • US11616384B2 patent drawing
  • US11616384B2 patent drawing
  • US11616384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It is an object of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure to provide a battery charger with a constant current control loop, for use in linear and switching chargers. Advantages include digital controls and a comparator, for decreasing charging current towards termination. The technique of the disclosure eliminates a constant voltage loop and amplifier, without increasing charging time. The technique also simplifies porting the design to another process technology node, and reduces size.