Secondary Battery Deterioration Evaluation Using Dynamic Current Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for determining secondary battery deterioration, such as voltage drop analysis, can lead to erroneous results due to factors like temperature and resistance changes, potentially misclassifying a deteriorated battery as non-defective.
Innovation Solution
A method and device that determine the output current value A1 based on acquired information like battery capacity, temperature, and resistance, using a control map to evaluate deterioration by comparing voltage drops during discharge, ensuring accurate assessment of battery health.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If voltage drop analysis is used to determine battery deterioration, then the evaluation process is simple, but the determination accuracy deteriorates due to temperature and resistance changes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the evaluation parameter from simple voltage drop to voltage drop per unit current ((V1-V2)/A1). This parameter transformation compensates for the effects of temperature and resistance variations, as the current-normalized voltage drop remains relatively stable across different operating conditions. The control map stores threshold values RO for this normalized parameter, enabling accurate deterioration determination regardless of temperature or resistance changes.
2Ease of operation
If constant discharge current is used for evaluation, then the test condition is easy to control, but erroneous deterioration determination occurs due to battery state variations
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces dynamic adaptation by determining the discharge current A1 based on real-time battery information (capacity, temperature, resistance) rather than using a fixed constant current. The control map provides different current values A1 corresponding to different battery states, allowing the evaluation to adapt to varying battery conditions while maintaining operational simplicity through automated current selection.
3Device complexity
If temperature and resistance variations are not considered, then the evaluation method is simple, but false negative results occur in deteriorated batteries
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary control map that mediates between the simple voltage measurement and the complex battery state (temperature, resistance, capacity). The control map stores pre-calculated threshold values RO and corresponding current values A1 that account for temperature and resistance effects. This intermediary structure enables the system to achieve high accuracy without directly measuring temperature or resistance, as the control map encapsulates these factors.
Data Source
AI summary
A device for evaluating a secondary battery disclosed herein includes: a first acquirer that acquires information on a predetermined item from a secondary battery to be evaluated; an output current determiner that determines an output current value to be output from the secondary battery based on the information obtained by the first acquirer; and an evaluator that evaluates a deterioration state of the secondary battery based on discharge data obtained when the output current value determined by the output current determiner is output.


