On-Site Battery Dispatch Control for Firm Capacity Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems require significant infrastructure investment by utilities to manage peak demand, leading to high costs passed on to customers, and customers bear the burden of installing and operating on-site energy storage systems without adequate control or cost savings.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that optimize energy dispatch across a fleet of on-site energy assets, including energy storage systems, to provide firm electric capacity and reduce electric costs for customers, by using a platform and gateway apparatus to calculate site load curves, perform portfolio-level optimization, and control on-site energy assets in real-time or near real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If utilities build infrastructure to support peak demand, then firm capacity is provided, but infrastructure investment costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirm capacityVSAvoidinfrastructure investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple distributed on-site energy storage systems into a virtual power plant, merging their capacities to collectively provide firm capacity that replaces traditional utility infrastructure investments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a platform apparatus as an intermediary that coordinates and controls on-site energy storage systems, enabling them to function collectively as firm capacity without direct utility infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If customers install on-site energy storage systems, then energy costs are reduced, but customers bear installation and operation costs without adequate control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy costVSAvoidcontrol
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The gateway apparatus serves as an intermediary between the on-site energy storage system and the platform, providing customers with remote control capabilities and transparency into system operation without requiring technical expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the platform monitors and controls on-site energy storage operation, providing customers with information about energy usage, costs, and system status to enable informed decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If utilities have no control over on-site energy storage systems, then customer autonomy is maintained, but utilities cannot rely on these resources for firm capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer autonomyVSAvoidfirm capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The platform and gateway apparatuses serve as intermediaries that enable utilities to remotely monitor and control on-site energy storage systems, providing firm capacity reliability while preserving customer autonomy through agreed-upon service arrangements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic control where the platform can adjust operation of on-site energy storage systems in real-time based on grid needs and customer preferences, allowing flexible adaptation between customer autonomy and utility reliability requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUSRE50382E1Method and apparatus for facilitating the operation of an on-site energy storage system to co-optimize battery dispatch
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 SDG GRIDCO LLC
  • USRE50382E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50382E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50382E1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are provided for facilitating the operation and control of a fleet of on-site energy assets and optimizing energy dispatch across the fleet, thereby facilitating the use of the on-site energy assets instead of grid-supplied electric consumption. An example system may comprise a central platform and a plurality of on-site gateway devices configured to perform on-site asset control. An example method may comprise receiving a service availability call, performing fleet-level optimization, generating a set of site-level schedules, and causing, as a function of the site-level schedules, real-time on-site asset control. Other embodiments provide for determining a location of each grid-connected energy consumer at which to reduce grid-supplied energy consumption, determining an amount of a reduction of grid-supplied energy consumption, and transmitting a signal to each corresponding gateway device located at the determined location, the signal comprising data indicative of instructions for performing on-site energy dispatch.