Lithium-Ion Battery Electrode Sheet Granulation Pressing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manufacturing methods for lithium-ion secondary battery electrode sheets using granulated particles often result in insufficient peel strength, even when pressing conditions are set similarly to those used with mixture pastes, due to differences in the bonding mechanisms and particle configurations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the preparation of granulated particles with active material particles and a binder, followed by feeding, leveling, and pressing these particles onto a current collector, where the ratio of the layer thickness to the mean particle size (t/D50) is set below 1 to ensure high peel strength and uniform weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If granulated particles are used to form the active material layer, then the drying step can be eliminated and manufacturing cost reduced, but the peel strength of the active material layer becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidpeel strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the particle size parameter of the granulated particles to a specific range (0.5 μm to 5 μm, with D50 of 1 μm to 3 μm) to optimize both the elimination of the drying step and the achievement of sufficient peel strength. This parameter optimization allows the particles to pack densely and bond effectively without requiring thermal drying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies a binder solution to the current collector before feeding the granulated particles. This preliminary action ensures that the particles are immediately bonded to the collector upon contact, achieving sufficient peel strength without requiring a subsequent drying step to evaporate solvents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If the same pressing conditions are used for granulated particles as for mixture paste, then the process is simplified, but the peel strength remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidpeel strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the pressing pressure parameter to a specific range (0.1 MPa to 10 MPa, preferably 0.5 MPa to 5 MPa) to achieve sufficient peel strength for granulated particles. This differs from mixture paste processing and represents a parameter change specifically tailored to granulated particle characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies a binder solution locally to the current collector surface before particle feeding. This creates a localized bonding zone that enhances peel strength at the particle-collector interface without requiring global process changes or increased pressing pressure throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If the particle size of granulated particles is reduced to improve layer uniformity, then weight distribution becomes more uniform, but the peel strength may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight distribution uniformityVSAvoidpeel strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention identifies an optimal particle size range (0.5 μm to 5 μm, D50 of 1 μm to 3 μm) that simultaneously achieves uniform weight distribution and sufficient peel strength. Particles that are too small fail to provide adequate mechanical interlocking, while particles that are too large create uneven distribution. The specified range optimizes both characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite structure consisting of granulated particles (containing active material) combined with a binder material. This composite approach allows the particles to maintain their size for uniformity while the binder provides the adhesive bonding necessary for peel strength, resolving the contradiction between particle size and bonding performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10658652B2Method of manufacturing lithium-ion secondary battery electrode sheet
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10658652B2 patent drawing
  • US10658652B2 patent drawing
  • US10658652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a lithium-ion secondary battery electrode sheet proposed herein includes the step of pressing granulated particles (13a), wherein the ratio (t/D50) is less than 1, where D50 is the mean particle size of the granulated particles (13a) and t is the thickness of a layer (14) of active material particles (13a1) after pressing.