Battery Electrolyte Composition With Brominated Flame Retardants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium-ion batteries face safety concerns due to the use of flammable solvents in their electrolyte solutions, and existing flame retardants often compromise electrochemical performance or are costly.

Innovation Solution

The development of nonaqueous electrolyte solutions for lithium batteries that incorporate oxygen-containing brominated flame retardants, such as specific brominated benzenes and fluorobenzenes, which are miscible and stable, minimizing impact on battery performance while effectively suppressing fires.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flammable solvents are used in lithium-ion battery electrolytes, then electrochemical performance is maintained, but safety is compromised due to fire hazard

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidflammability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces oxygen-containing brominated flame retardants as intermediary substances that mediate between the flammable electrolyte solvent and fire prevention. These flame retardants act as a protective layer that interferes with the combustion process while maintaining electrolyte functionality, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and flammability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the electrolyte by incorporating specific oxygen-containing brominated compounds (such as brominated benzenes with alkoxy groups) that modify the fire properties of the electrolyte without significantly altering its electrochemical performance parameters, thereby achieving safety improvement while maintaining functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional flame retardants are added to electrolyte solutions, then fire suppression is achieved, but electrochemical performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppressionVSAvoidelectrochemical performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing flame retardant molecules with specific local functional groups (alkoxy groups with particular chain lengths and structures) that are positioned at specific locations on the benzene ring. This localized structural design allows the flame retardant to perform its fire suppression function while minimizing interference with the bulk electrolyte's electrochemical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite electrolyte system by combining conventional electrolyte solvents with oxygen-containing brominated flame retardants. This composite approach allows the system to benefit from both the electrochemical performance of the base electrolyte and the fire suppression capabilities of the flame retardant additive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If effective flame retardants are incorporated into electrolytes, then fire safety is improved, but battery performance is negatively affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire safetyVSAvoidbattery performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using small concentrations of oxygen-containing brominated flame retardants (typically 0.1-5 wt%) in the electrolyte solution. This partial incorporation is sufficient to achieve fire suppression while minimizing the negative impact on battery performance, avoiding the need for excessive amounts that would harm productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If flame retardants are added to electrolyte solutions, then flammability is reduced, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflammability reductionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs relatively inexpensive brominated benzene derivatives with common alkoxy groups as flame retardants. These compounds can be synthesized through standard organic chemistry procedures using readily available starting materials, making them cost-effective compared to more complex flame retardant structures. The use of simple molecular structures reduces both synthesis and purification costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These solutions effectively extinguish fires in lithium-ion batteries under laboratory conditions without significant degradation of electrochemical performance, meeting safety and cost-effectiveness criteria.

Implementation Method 1

For a flame retardant to be a suitable component of an electrolyte solution, solubility in the electrolyte is needed, along with electrochemical stability over the range of battery operation, and minimal negative effect on battery performance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame inhibition:

Data Source

PatentUS20240170736A1Flame retardants for battery electrolytes
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 ALBEMARLE CORP

AI summary

This invention provides nonaqueous electrolyte solutions for lithium batteries. The nonaqueous electrolyte solutions comprise a liquid electrolyte medium; a lithium-containing salt; and at least one oxygen-containing brominated flame retardant.