Dynamic Battery Exchange Pricing for Energy Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vehicle battery exchange systems face challenges in predicting and responding to user demand, leading to inefficiencies in energy usage and cost, particularly due to the difficulty in managing battery charging and state of charge across multiple stations.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic battery exchange pricing system that collects demand information, clusters it based on time, station type, and location, and uses genetic algorithms to adjust prices in real-time, incentivizing users to exchange batteries at optimal times and locations, thereby balancing energy distribution among stations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If batteries are charged and maintained at all exchange stations to ensure availability, then user experience is improved, but energy consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery availabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts battery pricing based on real-time demand predictions and station states. Prices vary by time of day, day of week, and predicted demand at different stations, creating economic incentives that dynamically balance battery distribution without requiring uniform over-charging at all locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the economic parameter (battery exchange price) to influence user behavior and battery flow. By adjusting prices according to predicted demand and station battery levels, the system optimizes energy usage while maintaining adequate availability, avoiding the need to keep batteries charged at all stations at all times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If batteries are charged and maintained at all exchange stations to ensure availability, then battery availability is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery availabilityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously monitoring battery exchange patterns, predicting future demand using machine learning models, and adjusting pricing strategies accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables cost-effective battery management by responding to actual usage patterns rather than maintaining static over-provisioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The pricing system dynamically adapts to changing conditions including time of day, day of week, predicted demand, and station-specific battery levels. This dynamic approach replaces static cost structures with adaptive pricing that optimizes both availability and cost efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system predicts and responds to battery demand at all stations, then battery availability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery availabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the battery exchange network into multiple stations with individual demand prediction models and pricing strategies. Each station is analyzed separately based on its unique characteristics, location, and usage patterns, allowing complex prediction and response mechanisms to be applied locally rather than requiring a monolithic system-wide approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized server acts as an intermediary that collects data from all stations, runs machine learning predictions, and distributes pricing instructions back to individual stations. This intermediary architecture manages system complexity by centralizing the computational burden while allowing distributed implementation at station level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10926742B2Systems and methods for dynamically allocating energy among exchangeable energy storage device stations
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 GOGORO
  • US10926742B2 patent drawing
  • US10926742B2 patent drawing
  • US10926742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods and associated systems for managing a plurality of device-exchange stations. The method includes, for example, (1) determining a score for each of the plurality of device-exchange stations based on an availability of energy storage devices positioned in each of the device-exchange stations; (2) determining a sequence of the plurality of device-exchange stations based on the score of each of the device-exchange stations; and (3) determining a price rate for each of the device-exchange stations by mapping the sequence of the device-exchange stations to a characteristic curve corresponding to a distribution of the price rate.