Battery Pack Fire Protection Composite for Thermal Runaway Containment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fire protection systems for battery packs are inadequate in preventing the spread of heat and fire from thermal runaway, as ablative compounds are restricted by adhesive layers and lack sufficient stiffness for plastic deformability, leading to limited functionality and increased production costs.

Innovation Solution

A composite fire protection device with a carrier layer, adhesive layer, and fire-protection layer containing ablative compounds, where the fire-protection layer is in direct contact with the battery, utilizing a silicate fiber needle mat as the carrier layer for stiffness and plastic deformability, and ablative compounds like synthetic ettringite and Al(OH)3 for effective heat management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an adhesive layer is used to bond the fire protection layer to the battery, then the composite system can be assembled, but the ablative compound is restricted from directly acting on the battery, limiting its fire protection functionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protection functionalityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive layer is completely removed from between the fire protection layer and the battery. The fire protection layer with ablative compounds is placed in direct contact with the battery, allowing the ablative compounds to act directly on the battery surface for effective fire protection without the restriction of an adhesive layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If glass fiber nonwoven is used as the carrier layer, then the composite system can be assembled, but it lacks sufficient stiffness for plastic deformability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplastic deformabilityVSAvoidstiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier layer is changed from glass fiber nonwoven to a composite material consisting of a plastic film with a glass fiber fleece on at least one side. This composite structure combines the flexibility and deformability of the plastic film with the stiffness and dimensional stability of the glass fiber fleece, enabling both plastic deformability and sufficient stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the fire protection layer is not in direct contact with the battery, then the adhesive layer provides bonding, but the ablative compounds cannot effectively prevent heat and fire spread

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat and fire protectionVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive layer is removed entirely, allowing the fire protection layer to be in direct contact with the battery. This enables the ablative compounds in the fire protection layer to directly prevent heat and fire spread from thermal runaway without the interference of an adhesive layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If conventional carrier materials are used, then the composite system can be assembled, but dimensional stability during deformation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplastic deformabilityVSAvoiddimensional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier layer uses a composite material of plastic film with glass fiber fleece that provides both plastic deformability and dimensional stability. The glass fiber fleece embedded in the plastic film maintains the structural integrity and dimensional stability even when the composite system is deformed during installation or operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents heat and fire spread from thermal runaway, ensuring the stability of the fire protection device and reducing production costs by enabling direct action of ablative compounds and providing dimensional stability and plastic deformability.

Implementation Method 1

a fire-protection layer (210) which contains at least one ablative compound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a silicate fiber needle mat as the carrier layer for stiffness and plastic deformability, and ablative compounds like synthetic ettringite and Al(OH)3 for effective heat management

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReinforcement:

Implementation Method 3

a composite system comprising (a1) a carrier layer (220), (a2) an adhesive layer (230), and (a3) a fire-protection layer (210)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS12107287B2Fire protection device with a composite system, composite system and battery pack with a fire protection device
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 CUYLITS HLDG GMBH
  • US12107287B2 patent drawing
  • US12107287B2 patent drawing
  • US12107287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Fire protection device with composite system, composite system and battery pack with fire protection device.The present application describes a fire protection device comprising(a) a composite system including(a1) a carrier layer,(a2) an adhesive layer, and(a3) a fire protection layer containing at least one ablative-acting compound,and(b) a shell inside which the composite system is arranged.The fire protection device can be used in battery packs, in order to avoid overheating and/or contain a fire in the battery pack.